UPC APP 20143/2024

—

Verfahrensdetails: Status
—
Verfahrensart
Verfahrensantrag
Kategorie
Sonstige prozessuale
Parteien: Kläger
Progress Maschinen & Automation AG
Vertreter: Markus Gangl (Torggler & Hofmann Patentanwälte); Florian Robl (Torggler & Hofmann Patentanwälte)
Beklagte
AWM s.r.l.
SCHNELL S.p.A.
Vertreter: Not Specified
Division: Court of Appeal
Richter: —
Sprache: —
Erste Entscheidung: 2. Mai 2024

Entscheidungen

2024-05-02
Generic application
The Court of Appeal issued an order on the application for suspensive effect filed by Progress Maschinen & Automation AG, concerning an order by the Milan Local Division that had granted preservation of evidence and inspection orders in favour of AWM and SCHNELL. The court examined whether suspensive effect was warranted to prevent the appeal from being rendered largely ineffective.
Rechtsfragen:Suspensive effect of appeal (R. 220 RoP)Preservation of evidence and inspection ordersAccess to expert reports by partiesEffectiveness of appeal pending execution

Dokumente