UPClytics
View all cases

UPC APP 22313/2025

·EP3076673: DECODING AND ENCODING OF PICTURES OF A VIDEO SEQUENCE

Case details
Status
Action
Procedural application
Category
Case Management Orders
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Wim Maas
Respondents
Reps: Alexander Wilson
Division
Milan LD
Judges
Technology
Telecommunications
Language
First decided
Jun 20, 2025
Decisions
  • 2025-06-20
    Application Rop 333

    Milan Local Division panel dismissed Ericsson's application for review (Rule 333 RoP) of the judge-rapporteur's order refusing to impose an 'external eyes only' confidentiality regime for license agreements submitted as FRAND evidence. The panel held that Ericsson failed to substantiate the specific antitrust risk from allowing one Asustek employee access to the documents. Leave to appeal was granted to allow the Court of Appeal to set a standard on external-eyes-only confidentiality regimes in SEP/FRAND cases.

    Legal issues:Confidentiality protection under Rule 262A RoPExternal-eyes-only regime in FRAND/SEP proceedingsAntitrust risk threshold for restricting party access to documentsPanel review under Rule 333 RoP
Documents
  • E8D24C6F9A2E7325AC9E8E395CBDC39F_en.pdf2025-06-20EN