View all cases
UPC APP 26135/2025
EP3918974 Unitary patent · COMPUTERIZED REFRACTION AND ASTIGMATISM DETERMINATION
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Respondents
- Easee B.V.Operating co.
- Yves PrevooOther / unknown
- Easee Holding B.V.Operating co.
Representatives- Wim Maas-Taylor Wessing
- Division
- Hamburg LD
- Judges
- Technology
- InstrumentsOptics · Medical technology
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Jun 26, 2025
- EPO Opposition
- Easee Health B.V.Withdrawn2024-09-13
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Hamburg LD | Locked |
| Judge Stefan Schilling | Locked |
At the UPC: Visibly Inc. (9 cases)·Easee B.V. (9 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 6 other proceedings
UPC CoA 542/2025·UPC CoA 526/2025·UPC CFI 14/2025·UPC CFI 525/2024·UPC APP 55164/2024 and 1 more
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Hamburg LD·2025
Decisions
- 2025-06-26
Summary: The Hamburg Local Division granted a stay of proceedings under Rule 311 RoP following the bankruptcy of defendants Easee B.V. and Easee Holding B.V., suspended the security for costs obligation for all defendants during the stay, and held that the court's power to revoke the security order was suspended pending an appeal.
Show the legal issues (4)
- Stay of proceedings due to insolvency (R. 311 RoP)
- Security for costs (R. 158 RoP)
- Revocation of case management order (R. 335 RoP)
- Liability of managing director for patent infringement
Documents
- 05D0ACD8F03BE35D91A44FC1C31D6DD7_en.pdf2025-06-26EN