UPC APP 28993/2024
EP3466498 · SEARCH DEVICE FOR AVALANCHE VICTIMS AND METHOD FOR OPERATING A SEARCH DEVICE FOR AVALANCHE VICTIMS
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Claimants
- Ortovox Sportartikel GmbHOperating co.
Representatives- Miriam Kiefer-Kather Augenstein
- Robert Knaps-Kather Augenstein
- Michael Siebelsupporting-Hofstetter, Schurack & Partner
Respondents- Mammut Sports Group AGOperating co.
- Mammut Sports Group GmbHOperating co.
Representatives- Oliver Jan Jüngst-Bird & Bird LLP
- Moritz Schroeder-Bird & Bird LLP
- Alexander Bothe-Bird & Bird LLP
- Fabian Leimgrubersupporting-Thomann Fischer
- Division
- Dusseldorf LD
- Judges
- —
- Technology
- Other fieldsConsumer products
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Aug 5, 2024
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Dusseldorf LD | Locked |
At the UPC: Ortovox Sportartikel GmbH (22 cases)·Mammut Group (22 cases)
This dispute contains 19 other proceedings
UPC CoA 216/2025·UPC CoA 217/2025·UPC CoA 228/2025·UPC CFI 121/2025·UPC CFI 124/2025 and 14 more
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Dusseldorf LD·2024
- 2024-08-05
Summary: The Düsseldorf Local Division granted the applicant's request to release a cash deposit that had been provided as security for enforcement of an ex-parte provisional measures order, on the basis that the applicant had subsequently provided a bank guarantee and the double security was unnecessary. The court clarified that while such an exchange of security is permissible in principle, it remains subject to the court's discretion under R. 352.2 RoP, balancing the interests of all parties.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Release of security deposit after provision of bank guarantee (R. 352.2 RoP)
- Exchange of security in provisional measures proceedings
- Discretion of court in security substitution
- 63331DB7BE59BEA9CA9C55E842AD3FA9_de.pdf2024-08-05DE