UPC APP 29027/2025
EP3511174 · PLANOGRAPHIC PRINTING PLATE ORIGINAL PLATE, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING PLANOGRAPHIC PRINTING PLATE, AND PLANOGRAPHIC PRINTING METHOD
- Case details
- StatusClaim dismissedActionProcedural applicationCategoryCase management orders
- Parties
- Respondents
- Kodak GmbHOperating co.
- Kodak Graphic Communications GmbHOperating co.
- Kodak Holding GmbHOperating co.
Representatives- Elena Hennecke-Freshfields
- Division
- Mannheim LD
- Technology
- InstrumentsOptics
- Mechanical engineeringTextile and paper machines
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Jul 16, 2025
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Mannheim LD | Locked |
| Judge Peter Tochtermann | Locked |
| Judge Dirk Böttcher | Locked |
| Judge Peter Agergaard | Locked |
| Judge Erwin Wismeth | Locked |
At the UPC: Fujifilm Group (52 cases)·Kodak Group (52 cases)
This dispute contains 24 other proceedings
UPC CFI 3254/2026·UPC CFI 3265/2026·UPC CFI 3269/2026·UPC CFI 3173/2026·UPC CoA 130/2026 and 19 more
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Mannheim LD·2025
- 2025-07-16Application RoP 333Public
Summary: FUJIFILM Corporation's request for review of the judge-rapporteur's order rejecting its intended enforcement warning (penalty application under R. 354.4 RoP) was rejected. The panel upheld the judge-rapporteur's reasoning: no specific time periods or penalty amounts were fixed in the main decision for the destruction/recall/removal orders, and claimant should have challenged those points on appeal rather than via panel review.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Panel review of case management order (R. 333 RoP)
- Enforcement warning and penalty under R. 354.4 RoP
- Scope of operative part of main decision
- B4E6E1FA9C25EEAD5F26DD5E1A1C00E0_en.pdf2025-07-16EN