UPC APP 29027/2025

—·EP3511174: PLANOGRAPHIC PRINTING PLATE ORIGINAL PLATE, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING PLANOGRAPHIC PRINTING PLATE, AND PLANOGRAPHIC PRINTING METHOD

Verfahrensdetails: Status
—
Verfahrensart
Verfahrensantrag
Kategorie
Verfahrensführungsanordnungen
Parteien: Kläger
Fujifilm Corporation
Vertreter: Christof Augenstein (Kather Augenstein)
Beklagte
Kodak GmbH
Kodak Graphic Communications GmbH
Kodak Holding GmbH
Vertreter: Elena Hennecke (Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer)
Division: Mannheim LD
Richter: Peter Tochtermann · Presiding judge, judge-rapporteur
Dirk Böttcher · Legally qualified judge
Peter Agergaard · Legally qualified judge
Erwin Wismeth · Technically qualified judge
Sprache: —
Erste Entscheidung: 16. Juli 2025

Entscheidungen

2025-07-16
AbgewiesenApplication Rop 333
FUJIFILM Corporation's request for review of the judge-rapporteur's order rejecting its intended enforcement warning (penalty application under R. 354.4 RoP) was rejected. The panel upheld the judge-rapporteur's reasoning: no specific time periods or penalty amounts were fixed in the main decision for the destruction/recall/removal orders, and claimant should have challenged those points on appeal rather than via panel review.
Rechtsfragen:Panel review of case management order (R. 333 RoP)Enforcement warning and penalty under R. 354.4 RoPScope of operative part of main decision

Dokumente