UPC_APP_33375/2024

LOW PROFILE DELIVERY SYSTEM FOR TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE

Procedural & sub-applicationsCosts AssessmentsNordic-Baltic RDGenericCase Closed

This case cites

Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
262.1	jurisdiction — no legal basis to order third-party applicant to pay costs incurred under R.262.1(b)	Binding	There is no legal basis for ordering a member of the public, who has made a request for access to written pleadings and evidence, to reimburse legal costs incurred by the parties to the relevant proceedings when they are consulted by the judge-rapporteur in accordance with Rule 262.1(b) RoP.
265	costs — withdrawal of access applications	Binding	Keywords: Rule 262.1(b) RoP, Rule 265 RoP, Article 69 UPCA, access to pleadings and evidence, withdrawal, legal costs.
156.2	costs — cost decision on withdrawal	Background	Meril Life Sciences PVT Limited has requested • a cost decision be issued (R. 156.2, 265.2(c) RoP);
265.2	costs — cost decision on withdrawal	Background	Meril Life Sciences PVT Limited has requested • a cost decision be issued (R. 156.2, 265.2(c) RoP)
262.2	jurisdiction — decision by judge-rapporteur alone on access requests	Binding	This is an order by judge-rapporteur Stefan Johansson (cf. Rule 262.2(b) RoP)

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
69	costs — Art. 69 UPCA does not apply to third-party access proceedings	Binding	Article 69 UPCA does not apply in this situation. Therefore, such requests for reimbursement of costs shall be dismissed.

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
UPC_CoA_404/2023	costs — Meril cited CoA authority on cost recovery for third-party access proceedings	Distinguished	As far as the legal basis is concerned, Meril Life Sciences PVT Limited has inter alia referred to Rule 265.2(c) RoP, the decision of the Court of Appeal of 10 April 2024 in UPC_CoA_404/2023

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
UPC_CFI_8/2023	costs — prior access-to-documents cost order at Nordic-Baltic Division	Distinguished	the decision of the Court of Appeal of 10 April 2024 in UPC_CoA_404/2023 and an order by another judge-rapporteur at the Nordic-Baltic Regional Division, issued on 18 September 2024 in UPC_CFI_8/2023

Cited by

Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.

Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.