UPC APP 3348/2025
Jan 21, 2025·EP2145848 · False twist texturing machine
- Case details
- StatusWritten Phase (Claim dismissed)ActionGenericCategoryFile-access requests (R. 262.1(b))
- Parties
- Claimants
- Bhagat Textile EngineersOperating co.
Representatives- Joel Coles-Powell Gilbert (Europe) LLP
- Peter Fitzpatrick-Powell Gilbert (Europe) LLP
Respondents- Himson Engineering Private LimitedOperating co.
- Oerlikon Textile GmbH & CO KGOperating co.
Representatives- Fabrizio Jacobacci-Jacobacci Avvocati
- Stefania Bergia-Simmons & Simmons
- Giulio E. Sironi-Simmons & Simmons
- Division
- Milan LD
- Technology
- Mechanical engineeringHandling · Textile and paper machines
- Language
- Italian
- First decided
- Feb 20, 2025
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Milan LD | Locked |
| Judge Pierluigi Perrotti | Locked |
| Judge Alima Zana | Locked |
| Judge Carine Gillet | Locked |
| Judge Michel Abello | Locked |
At the UPC: Bhagat Textile Engineers (6 cases)·Himson Engineering Private Limited (6 cases)
This dispute contains 6 other proceedings
UPC CoA 12/2025·UPC CoA 8/2025·UPC CFI 761/2024·UPC CFI 241/2023·UPC APP 21554/2024 and 1 more
2 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
- 2025-02-20Application RoP262.1 (b)Public
Summary: Application by Bhagat Textile Engineers for public access under R.262.1(b) RoP to the counterclaim for revocation case file (Himson v. Oerlikon) in proceedings before the Milan Local Division was rejected. The court held that the information sought was obtainable from other public sources, that Bhagat had already been found to infringe the patent in parallel proceedings and had procedurally chosen not to challenge the patent, and that granting access would compromise the integrity of pending settlement negotiations between the parties.
Show the legal issues (4)
- Public access to case file R.262.1(b) RoP, Art.45 UPCA
- Legitimate interest in access
- Integrity of proceedings and settlement negotiations
- Prior procedural choices as bar to access
| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Outcome of the Order | 2025-02-20 | Not public |
| 262 1 b ROP | 2025-02-20 | Public |
| Doc. 2 Order della Corte d'Appello su istanza ex Rule 223 RoP | 2025-02-10 | Not public |
| Doc. 1 – Decisione del 4 novembre 2024 della Divisione Locale di Milano (ACT_5495852023 – 2412023) | 2025-02-10 | Not public |
| Note autorizzate nell interesse di Oerlikon | 2025-02-10 | Not public |
| doc. 1_Decisione DL Milano 04.11.24 | 2025-02-10 | Not public |
| doc. 2_Ordine CoA 16.01.25 | 2025-02-10 | Not public |
| Osservazioni Himson_10.02.25 | 2025-02-10 | Not public |
| Access Request Translated to Italian | 2025-01-27 | Not public |
| rule 262.1. ROP | 2025-01-27 | Not public |
| 2025.01.16 - Order_R223 RoP_Suspensive Effect (ORD 598484/2023) (EN translation) | 2025-01-21 | Not public |
| 2025.01.21 - Access Request | 2025-01-21 | Not public |