UPC CoA 12/2025
Jan 8, 2025·EP2145848 · False twist texturing machine
- Case details
- StatusCase ClosedActionAppealCategoryMain appeal
- Parties
- Claimants
- Bhagat Textile EngineersOperating co.
Representatives- Peter Fitzpatrick-Powell Gilbert (Europe) LLP
- Joel Coles-Powell Gilbert (Europe) LLP
- Rajvinder Jagdev-Powell Gilbert (Europe) LLP
- Niccolò Ferretti-Nunziante Magrone
- Emanuela Gaia Zapparoli
Respondents- Oerlikon Textile GmbH & CO KGOperating co.
Representatives- Stefania Bergia-Simmons & Simmons
- Giulio E. Sironi-Simmons & Simmons
- Division
- Court of Appeal
- Technology
- Mechanical engineeringHandling · Textile and paper machines
- Language
- Italian
- First decided
- Jan 16, 2025
- Last decision
- Dec 9, 2025
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Judge Klaus Grabinski | Locked |
| Judge Emmanuel Gougé | Locked |
| Judge Emanuela Germano | Locked |
At the UPC: Bhagat Textile Engineers (6 cases)·Oerlikon Textile GmbH & CO KG (13 cases)
This dispute contains 6 other proceedings
UPC APP 3348/2025·UPC CoA 8/2025·UPC CFI 761/2024·UPC CFI 241/2023·UPC APP 21554/2024 and 1 more
2 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Court of Appeal·2025
- 2025-12-09Appeal RoP220.1Public
Summary: Italian-language version of the Court of Appeal decision (same case as UPC_CoA_8/2025) on damages and costs in the Bhagat v Oerlikon appeal (EP 2 145 848). The CoA confirmed Bhagat's negligent infringement, rejected Oerlikon's reputational damage claims, and upheld the 80/20 cost split from the first-instance proceedings.
Show the legal issues (4)
- Damages assessment (Art. 68 UPCA)
- Knowledge/negligence of infringer
- Moral/reputational prejudice
- Cost allocation
- 2025-01-16Application RoP 223Public
Summary: The Court of Appeal (judge-rapporteur Emmanuel Gougé) rejected Bhagat Textile Engineers' application for suspensive effect (R. 223 RoP) of the Milan Local Division's infringement judgment of 4 November 2024 concerning EP 2 145 848. The Milan LD had found Bhagat liable for infringement, issued an injunction for Italy and Germany, imposed a penalty payment of EUR 12,000, and ordered provisional damages of EUR 15,000. Bhagat failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances justifying suspensive effect, having only vaguely claimed parallel invalidity proceedings and 'considerable doubts' about validity without substantiation.
Show the legal issues (4)
- Suspensive effect of appeal (R. 223 RoP)
- Exceptional circumstances threshold for suspensive effect
- Infringement judgment with injunction and provisional damages
- Parallel invalidity proceedings as basis for suspensive effect
| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Case closed | 2025-12-09 | Not public |
| Outcome of the Order | 2025-01-16 | Not public |
| Order | 2025-01-16 | Public |
| Panel-Appointment | 2025-01-14 | Not public |
| Panel-Appointment | 2025-01-09 | Not public |
| Receipt | 2025-01-09 | Not public |
| 2025.01.08 Application for Suspensive Effect - EN ORIGINAL - SIGNED | 2025-01-08 | Not public |
| 2025.01.08 Application for Suspensive Effect - EN ORIGINAL - SIGNED | 2025-01-08 | Not public |