View all cases
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Claimants
- Dolby International ABOperating co.
Representatives- Volkmar Henke-Bardehle Pagenberg
- Tilmann Müller-Bardehle Pagenberg
- Georg Anetsbergersupporting-Bardehle Pagenberg
- Johannes Möllersupporting-Bardehle Pagenberg
- Division
- Dusseldorf LD
- Judges
- —
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringAudio-visual technology
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Jun 24, 2024
- EPO Opposition
- Unified Patents, LLCAdmissible2022-04-14
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Dusseldorf LD | Locked |
At the UPC: Dolby Group (38 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patent8 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
UPC CFI 1446/2025·UPC CFI 58/2025·UPC CFI 694/2024·UPC CFI 235/2024·CC 21620/2024 and 3 more
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Dusseldorf LD·2024
Decisions
- 2024-06-24
Summary: The Düsseldorf Local Division granted Dolby International's application for a deadline extension to file its Reply to the Defence, holding that where access to pleadings was initially restricted under Rule 262A RoP, a party must be granted sufficient time once access is given to consult with its technical experts.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Deadline extension Rule 9.3 RoP
- Confidential information Rule 262A RoP
- Access restrictions and fair hearing
Documents
- 23DACC8DFFABBDC35E6CB67C463646DB_de.pdf2024-06-24DE