UPClytics
View all cases

UPC APP 34793/2025

·EP3926698: LIGHT EMITTING DIODE

Case details
Status
Action
Procedural application
Category
Other Procedural
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Bolko Ehlgen (Linklaters LLP); Olaf Isfort (Schneiders & Behrendt)
Respondents
Reps: Dirk Jestaedt (KRIEGER MES Partnerschaft mbB)
Division
Court of Appeal
Judges
Technology
Semiconductor Devices
Language
First decided
Aug 21, 2025
Decisions
  • 2025-08-21
    Generic application

    The Court of Appeal disregarded applications filed by Seoul Viosys after the oral hearing had closed, ruling that parties must refrain from further communications with the court after an oral hearing and there is no need to summarise oral argument in writing.

    Legal issues:Post-hearing submissionsPermissibility of further written submissions after oral hearing (R. 9, R. 36 RoP)
Documents
  • 020C114D28296406CB6037510BE74F92_de.pdf2025-08-21DE