UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen

UPC APP 34793/2025

·EP3926698: LIGHT EMITTING DIODE

Verfahrensdetails
Status
Verfahrensart
Verfahrensantrag
Kategorie
Sonstige prozessuale
Parteien
Kläger
Vertreter: Bolko Ehlgen (Linklaters LLP); Olaf Isfort (Schneiders & Behrendt)
Beklagte
Vertreter: Dirk Jestaedt (KRIEGER MES Partnerschaft mbB)
Division
Court of Appeal
Richter
Technology
Semiconductor Devices
Sprache
Erste Entscheidung
21. Aug. 2025
Entscheidungen
  • 2025-08-21
    Generic application

    The Court of Appeal disregarded applications filed by Seoul Viosys after the oral hearing had closed, ruling that parties must refrain from further communications with the court after an oral hearing and there is no need to summarise oral argument in writing.

    Rechtsfragen:Post-hearing submissionsPermissibility of further written submissions after oral hearing (R. 9, R. 36 RoP)
Dokumente
  • 020C114D28296406CB6037510BE74F92_de.pdf2025-08-21DE