View all cases
UPC APP 35497/2025
EP2624031 · Method and Arrangement for generating a laser beam having a differing beam profile characteristic by means of a multi-clad fibre
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Claimants
- TRUMPF Laser- und Systemtechnik SEOperating co.
Representatives- Matthias Sonntag-Gleiss Lutz
- Benedikt Burger-Gleiss Lutz
- Mischa Krumm-Gleiss Lutz
- Andreas Eiselesupporting-Witte, Weller & Partner Patentanwälte mbB
Respondents- IPG Laser GmbH & Co. KGOperating co.
Representatives- Frank Peterreins-Peterreins Schley
- Jan-Malte Schley-Peterreins Schley
- Felix Glöckler-Peterreins Schley
- Division
- Dusseldorf LD
- Technology
- InstrumentsOptics
- Mechanical engineeringMachine tools
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Sep 12, 2025
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Dusseldorf LD | Locked |
| Judge Jule Schumacher | Locked |
| Judge Peter Agergaard | Locked |
| Judge Anders Hansson | Locked |
At the UPC: TRUMPF Laser- und Systemtechnik SE (4 cases)·IPG Laser GmbH & Co. KG (9 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 3 other proceedings
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Dusseldorf LD·2025
Decisions
- 2025-09-12
Summary: The Düsseldorf Local Division (full panel) issued a procedural order in the infringement action (with counterclaim for revocation) between TRUMPF and IPG Laser concerning EP 2 624 031. The order addressed the admissibility of new auxiliary requests filed by the claimant under R. 30.2 RoP as part of the application to amend the patent.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Admissibility of new auxiliary requests in application to amend patent (R. 30.2 RoP)
- R. 36 RoP further written pleadings
- Counterclaim for revocation
Documents
- 65F4EBD6A043EC4E89957FDF6CA09B38_de.pdf2025-09-12DE