UPC APP 35917/2025
EP2624031 · Method and Arrangement for generating a laser beam having a differing beam profile characteristic by means of a multi-clad fibre
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Claimants
- TRUMPF Laser- und Systemtechnik SEOperating co.
Representatives- Matthias Sonntag-Gleiss Lutz
- Benedikt Burger-Gleiss Lutz
- Mischa Krumm-Gleiss Lutz
- Andreas Eiselesupporting-Witte, Weller & Partner Patentanwälte mbB
Respondents- IPG Laser GmbH & Co. KGOperating co.
Representatives- Frank Peterreins-Peterreins Schley
- Jan-Malte Schley-Peterreins Schley
- Felix Glöckler-Peterreins Schley
- Division
- Dusseldorf LD
- Technology
- InstrumentsOptics
- Mechanical engineeringMachine tools
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Sep 12, 2025
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Dusseldorf LD | Locked |
| Judge Jule Schumacher | Locked |
| Judge Peter Agergaard | Locked |
| Judge Anders Hansson | Locked |
At the UPC: TRUMPF Laser- und Systemtechnik SE (4 cases)·IPG Laser GmbH & Co. KG (9 cases)
This dispute contains 3 other proceedings
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Dusseldorf LD·2025
- 2025-09-12
Summary: Düsseldorf Local Division issued a procedural order in infringement proceedings (with counterclaim for revocation and patent amendment application) concerning EP 2 624 031 B1. The order addressed TRUMPF's submissions, partly allowing and partly disregarding them under Rule 9.2 RoP: sections on claim interpretation and patent validity were allowed as part of the rejoinder to the revocation counterclaim; however, submissions on claim abandonment were excluded as outside the permitted written exchange. The claimant's request for leave to file additional briefs on claim abandonment under Rule 36 RoP was rejected.
Show the legal issues (4)
- Admissibility of submissions in rejoinder to revocation counterclaim under Rule 9.2 RoP
- Leave to file additional briefs under Rule 36 RoP
- Claim abandonment in infringement proceedings
- Scope of duplik in revocation proceedings
- E95546D5ABC6C6356C0530DC047F8DC1_de.pdf2025-09-12DE