UPC_APP_51844/2024

DATA PROCESSING, ANALYSIS METHOD OF GENE EXPRESSION DATA TO IDENTIFY ENDOGENOUS REFERENCE GENES

OtherPreliminary ObjectionMunich LDPreliminary objection—

This case cites

Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
32	jurisdiction	Binding	The UPC has jurisdiction over the action pursuant to Art. 32(1)(a) UPCA, Art. 2(g), Art. 3(c) UPCA.
47	jurisdiction	Background	Art. 47(1)(3) and Art. 68(1) UPCA are to be considered when interpreting the scope of the Court's jurisdiction under Art. 32(1) UPCA.
68	jurisdiction	Background	Art. 47(1)(3) and Art. 68(1) UPCA are to be considered when interpreting the scope of the Court's jurisdiction under Art. 32(1) UPCA.

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
19.1	jurisdiction	Binding	Preliminary Objection R. 19.1 (a) RoP, R. 20.1 RoP
20.1	jurisdiction	Binding	Preliminary Objection R. 19.1 (a) RoP, R. 20.1 RoP

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
UPC_CoA_188/2024	jurisdiction	Binding	This list of grounds for preliminary objection set out in Rule 19.1 RoP is exhaustive, which is why a preliminary objection cannot be based on other grounds (Court of Appeal, CoA_188/2024, Grounds for the Order of 03.09.2024 - Aylo/Dish).

Cited by

Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.

Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.