View all cases
UPC APP 5366/2025
—·EP4201327: FLUID DELIVERY DEVICE WITH TRANSCUTANEOUS ACCESS TOOL, INSERTION MECHANISM AND BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING FOR USE THEREWITH
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryOther Procedural
- Parties
- Division
- Milan CD
- Judges
- Andrea Postiglione · Judge-Rapporteur
- Technology
- Packaging & Conveying
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Feb 15, 2025
Decisions
- 2025-02-15Costs onlyCostsGeneric application
Procedural order from the Milan section of the Central Division (UPC_CFI_380/2024) on costs in preliminary injunction proceedings. EOFLOW applied for reimbursement of its costs incurred defending against Insulet's rejected preliminary injunction application. The Court ruled that costs of a preliminary phase must be settled at the time of the final merits decision, not parcelled out by procedural stage, and therefore deferred the costs question.
Legal issues:Costs in preliminary injunction proceedingsTiming of cost compensationInterplay between PI proceedings and merits proceedings
Documents
- 97614D9B0B9E831E386DF03FF41D523D_en.pdf2025-02-15EN