UPC_APP_601/2024

SUBSEA TEST APPARATUS, ASSEMBLY AND METHOD

Procedural & sub-applicationsOther ProceduralParis LDRequest to review an order ex-parte—

This case cites

Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
197.3	urgency	Binding	Starting point of the time limit under R. 197.3 RoP: the "execution of the measures" includes the service by the bailiff of the "procès-verbal de saisie" at the end of the operations.
196.5	jurisdiction	Binding	Within the legal framework of the UPC, a saisie carried out by "an expert assisted by a bailiff" is not contrary to the French Law and is in conformity with R. 196.5 of the RoP.
196.4	jurisdiction	Binding	Rule 196.4 and 5 of the RoP states: "The order to preserve evidence shall specify a person who shall carry out the measures referred to in paragraph 1 and present a written Report on the measures to preserve evidence."

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
Art. 55 French Constitution	jurisdiction	Background	According to Art. 55 of the French Constitution, an international treaty (such as the one establishing the UPC) prevails over national law.

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
Art. L. 615-5 French IPC	jurisdiction	Distinguished	Art. L. 615-5 al 1 of the French Intellectual Property Code provides that: « La contrefaçon peut être prouvée par tous moyens.

Cited by

Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.

Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.