View all cases
UPC APP 6074/2024
EP3611989 SEP · METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TRANSMITTING WIRELESS LOCAL AREA NETWORK INFORMATION
- Case details
- Status—Action—CategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Claimants
- Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd.Operating co.
Representatives- Tobias J. Hessel-Clifford Chance Partnerschaft mbB
Respondents- NETGEAR Deutschland GmbHOperating co.
- Netgear Inc.Operating co.
- Netgear International LimitedOperating co.
Representatives- Stephan Dorn
- Division
- —
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringDigital communication
- Language
- —
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Judge Matthias Zigann | Locked |
| Judge Tobias Pichlmaier | Locked |
| Judge Edger Brinkman | Locked |
At the UPC: Huawei Group (62 cases)·Netgear Group (20 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 14 other proceedings
UPC CFI 791/2024·UPC CFI 152/2024·UPC CoA 36/2024·UPC CoA 44/2024·CC 586627/2023 and 9 more
6 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
UPC CoA 180/2026·UPC CFI 1271/2026·UPC CFI 3450/2026·UPC CFI 3451/2026·UPC CFI 3452/2026 and 1 more
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: 2024
Decisions
- 2024-02-19Infringement ActionPublic
Summary: The Munich Local Division issued a post-hearing order in Huawei v. Netgear following a separate hearing under Rule 334(d) RoP on 19 February 2024, characterising that hearing as a separate hearing and setting out procedural steps regarding the recording and a pending Rule 336 RoP interim decision application.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Rule 334(d) RoP: separate hearing and characterisation thereof
- Rule 336 RoP: application for interim decision
- Access to hearing recordings under Rule 106 RoP analogy
Documents
- 2024-02-19%20LD%20Munich%20UPC_CFI_%209-2023%20App_6074-2024%20CFI_9-2023%20%20ACT_459771-2023%20anonymized.pdf2024-02-19DE