UPC APP 63878/2024
EP4072364 Unitary patent +1 more · PROTECTIVE DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MAKING SAID PROTECTIVE DEVICE
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryConfidentiality (RoP 262A / 262.2)
- Parties
- Claimants
- Dainese S.p.A.Operating co.
Respondents- Alpinestars S.p.A.Operating co.
- Alpinestars Research S.p.A.Operating co.
- Omnia Retail S.r.l.Operating co.
- Horizon Moto 95 - Maxxess CergyOperating co.
- MOTOCARD BIKE, S.L.Operating co.
- ULRICH HERPICH E.KOperating co.
- Division
- Milan LD
- Technology
- Mechanical engineeringTransport
- Other fieldsOther consumer goods
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Jan 24, 2025
- EPO Opposition
- Alpinestars S.p.A.Admissible2022-06-08
- Alpinestars S.p.A.Admissible2024-10-03
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Milan LD | Locked |
| Judge Pierluigi Perrotti | Locked |
| Judge Alima Zana | Locked |
| Judge Anna-Lena Klein | Locked |
| Judge Graham Ashley | Locked |
At the UPC: Dainese S.p.A. (17 cases)·Alpinestars S.p.A. (14 cases)
This dispute contains 16 other proceedings
UPC CoA 97/2026·UPC CFI 1781/2026·UPC CoA 931/2025·UPC CFI 182/2025·UPC CFI 831/2024 and 11 more
- 2025-01-24Application RoP262APublic
Summary: Procedural order from the Milan Local Division (UPC_CFI_472/2024) on Dainese's application for protection of confidential information under R. 262A RoP relating to a partial withdrawal submission. The Court ordered creation of a confidential club including at least one natural person from each party and their legal representatives, balancing confidentiality against the right to an effective defence. Access by Alpinestars/Motocard to unredacted documents was restricted to designated individuals.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Confidentiality protection (R. 262A RoP)
- Confidential club membership
- Balance between confidentiality and right to defence
- 993CE8B48A7614B5B428964AE8AD13DC_en.pdf2025-01-24EN