UPC Analytics
ENDE
Overview · Filed:

UPC_APP_66724/2024

On-board power supply monitor and power control system

Procedural & sub-applicationsWithdrawal ApplicationsCourt of AppealApplication Rop 265Settled at: Post-merits
Parties

Claimants

Reps: Florian Schmidt-Bogatzky (EIP Europe LLP)

Respondents

Reps: Marcus Grosch (Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP)
Judges
  • Klaus GrabinskiPresident of the Court of Appeal
  • Peter BlokLegally Qualified Judge
  • Emmanuel GougéLegally Qualified Judge / Judge-Rapporteur
Patents
  • EP 1 612 910
CPC codes: H02J13/12, Y04S10/30, Y02E60/00, Y04S20/00, Y02B90/20

Sector: Power Generation

Outcome
Withdrawn
Filed:
First decided: Jan 15, 2025
Language:
Settled at: Post-merits

Decision of the Court of Appeal (Panel 1) permitting withdrawal of Avago's appeal and counterclaim for revocation against a Hamburg Local Division decision in which the infringement action had been dismissed and the patent partially revoked. The Court of Appeal granted leave for withdrawal under Rule 265 RoP in appeal proceedings, holding that withdrawal is possible until the final decision becomes legally binding. As a consequence of the withdrawal of the revocation counterclaim, the pending requests to amend the patent became moot. The court also addressed reimbursement of court fees following the withdrawal.