UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen

UPC APP 66724/2024

·EP1612910: On-board power supply monitor and power control system

Verfahrensdetails
Status
Verfahrensart
Verfahrensantrag
Kategorie
Rücknahmeanträge
Parteien
Kläger
Vertreter: Florian Schmidt-Bogatzky (EIP Europe LLP)
Beklagte
Vertreter: Marcus Grosch (Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP)
Division
Court of Appeal
Richter
Technology
Power Generation
Sprache
Erste Entscheidung
15. Jan. 2025
Entscheidungen
  • 2025-01-15
    ZurückgenommenApplication Rop 265

    Decision of the Court of Appeal (Panel 1) permitting withdrawal of Avago's appeal and counterclaim for revocation against a Hamburg Local Division decision in which the infringement action had been dismissed and the patent partially revoked. The Court of Appeal granted leave for withdrawal under Rule 265 RoP in appeal proceedings, holding that withdrawal is possible until the final decision becomes legally binding. As a consequence of the withdrawal of the revocation counterclaim, the pending requests to amend the patent became moot. The court also addressed reimbursement of court fees following the withdrawal.

    Rechtsfragen:Withdrawal of appeal under Rule 265 RoP in appellate proceedingsEffect of withdrawal of revocation counterclaim on pending patent amendment requestsReimbursement of court fees after withdrawal
Dokumente
  • AF78160D2912D702740E13400C5CFD61_de.pdf2025-01-15GERMAN