UPC Analytics
DEEN
Übersicht · Eingereicht: —

UPC_APP_66724/2024

On-board power supply monitor and power control system

Prozessuale & UnteranträgeRücknahmeanträgeCourt of AppealApplication Rop 265—Vergleich erfolgt: Nach Hauptsache
ÜbersichtEntscheidungenDokumenteZeitverlauf
Parteien

Kläger

Vertreter: Florian Schmidt-Bogatzky (EIP Europe LLP)

Beklagte

Vertreter: Marcus Grosch (Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP)
Richter
  • Klaus GrabinskiPresident of the Court of Appeal
  • Peter BlokLegally Qualified Judge
  • Emmanuel GougéLegally Qualified Judge / Judge-Rapporteur
Patente
  • EP 1 612 910
CPC-Codes: H02J13/12, Y04S10/30, Y02E60/00, Y04S20/00, Y02B90/20

Sektor: Power Generation

Ausgang
Zurückgenommen
Eingereicht: —
Erste Entscheidung: 15. Jan. 2025
Sprache: —
Vergleich erfolgt: Nach Hauptsache

Decision of the Court of Appeal (Panel 1) permitting withdrawal of Avago's appeal and counterclaim for revocation against a Hamburg Local Division decision in which the infringement action had been dismissed and the patent partially revoked. The Court of Appeal granted leave for withdrawal under Rule 265 RoP in appeal proceedings, holding that withdrawal is possible until the final decision becomes legally binding. As a consequence of the withdrawal of the revocation counterclaim, the pending requests to amend the patent became moot. The court also addressed reimbursement of court fees following the withdrawal.