UPClytics
View all cases

UPC APP 6987/2025

·EP3993602 +1 more: DEVICE AND METHOD FOR HARVESTING TEXTILE HEMP

Case details
Status
Action
Procedural application
Category
Other Procedural
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Pieter Callens; Fay Reynaert; Hans Verstrepen; Ellen Crabbé
Respondents
Reps: Kristof Roox; Eline van Bogget; Margaux Dejonghe; Paul Hylarides; Anson van Rooij
Division
Brussels LD
Judges
Technology
Agriculture
Language
First decided
Feb 20, 2025
Decisions
  • 2025-02-20
    Generic application

    Brussels Local Division (20 February 2025) ruled on HYLER BV's contested addition of new non-infringement arguments and a new document in its rejoinder. The panel rejected the primary request, upheld the alternative request in part, and excluded certain paragraphs of HYLER's rejoinder (paragraphs 506–510) from consideration, finding they introduced new arguments not justified by Cretes' reply submissions. The request for an extra week to respond was also rendered moot.

    Legal issues:Admissibility of new arguments in rejoinderR. 9 RoP case managementLate submissions
Documents
  • 61E26695FBF54734A5C356BA873AB388_nl.pdf2025-02-20DUTCH