UPC APP 6987/2025

—·EP3993602 +1 more: DEVICE AND METHOD FOR HARVESTING TEXTILE HEMP

Verfahrensdetails: Status
—
Verfahrensart
Verfahrensantrag
Kategorie
Sonstige prozessuale
Parteien: Kläger
Cretes NV
Vertreter: Pieter Callens; Fay Reynaert; Hans Verstrepen; Ellen Crabbé
Beklagte
Hyler BV
Vertreter: Kristof Roox; Eline van Bogget; Margaux Dejonghe; Paul Hylarides; Anson van Rooij
Division: Brussels LD
Richter: Samuel Granata · Voorzitter / Rechter-Verslaggever
Andras Kupecz · Juridisch gekwalificeerde rechter
Daniel Voss · Juridisch gekwalificeerde rechter
Bernard Ledeboer · Technisch gekwalificeerde rechter
Technology: Agriculture
Sprache: —
Erste Entscheidung: 20. Feb. 2025

Entscheidungen

2025-02-20
Generic application
Brussels Local Division (20 February 2025) ruled on HYLER BV's contested addition of new non-infringement arguments and a new document in its rejoinder. The panel rejected the primary request, upheld the alternative request in part, and excluded certain paragraphs of HYLER's rejoinder (paragraphs 506–510) from consideration, finding they introduced new arguments not justified by Cretes' reply submissions. The request for an extra week to respond was also rendered moot.
Rechtsfragen:Admissibility of new arguments in rejoinderR. 9 RoP case managementLate submissions

Dokumente