Overview · Filed: —
UPC_APP_8339/2025
TREATMENT OF PAROXYSMAL NOCTURNAL HEMOGLOBINURIA PATIENTS BY AN INHIBITOR OF COMPLEMENT
Procedural & sub-applicationsOther ProceduralCourt of AppealGeneric application—
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.
Rules of Procedure · 3
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| 245 | application for rehearing | Binding | Rehearing (Art. 81(1) UPCA; R. 245 RoP); fundamental procedural defect |
| 247 | grounds for rehearing — fundamental procedural defect | Binding | deciding on a request for a rehearing based on a fundamental procedural defect pursuant to Art. 81(1)(b) UPCA jo. R. 247(c) RoP |
| 248 | requirement to have objected to defect during proceedings | Binding | if known, already objected to during the proceedings leading to the decision or on appeal (R. 248 RoP) |
EPC article · 2
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| 81 | rehearing based on fundamental procedural defect | Binding | Art. 81(1) UPCA offers the possibility to request a rehearing after a final decision when, in short, it is based on an act which has been held to constitute a criminal offence, or in the event of a fundamental procedural defect. |
| 76 | evaluation of evidence — free assessment by court | Binding | The Court shall evaluate the evidence presented by the parties freely and independently (Art. 76(3) UPCA). |
Court of Justice EU · 1
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kamino International Logistics, C-129/13 and C-130/13, EU:C:2014:2041 | procedural defect must causally affect outcome to be fundamental | Binding | a defect may only be considered fundamental if it can be established that without the defect the same decision would not have been taken (see judgment of 3 July 2014 in Kamino International Logistics, C-129/13 and C130/13, EU:C:2014:2041, paragraph 79) |
UPC Court of Appeal · 1
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| UPC_CoA_405/2024 | order under review — dismissal of provisional measures appeal | Background | Order of the Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court, 20 December 2024, ORD_60221/2024, APL_40553/2024, UPC_CoA_405/2024 |
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.
Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.