View all cases
UPC APP 8545/2025
EP4072364 Unitary patent +1 more · PROTECTIVE DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MAKING SAID PROTECTIVE DEVICE
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryCase management orders
- Parties
- Claimants
- Dainese S.p.A.Operating co.
Respondents- Alpinestars S.p.A.Operating co.
- Alpinestars Research S.p.A.Operating co.
- MOTOCARD BIKE, S.L.Operating co.
- Division
- Milan LD
- Technology
- Mechanical engineeringTransport
- Other fieldsOther consumer goods
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Apr 7, 2025
- EPO Opposition
- Alpinestars S.p.A.Admissible2022-06-08
- Alpinestars S.p.A.Admissible2024-10-03
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Milan LD | Locked |
| Judge Pierluigi Perrotti | Locked |
| Judge Alima Zana | Locked |
| Judge Anna-Lena Klein | Locked |
| Judge Graham Ashley | Locked |
At the UPC: Dainese S.p.A. (17 cases)·Alpinestars S.p.A. (14 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
This dispute contains 16 other proceedings
UPC CoA 97/2026·UPC CFI 1781/2026·UPC CoA 931/2025·UPC CFI 182/2025·UPC CFI 831/2024 and 11 more
Decisions
- 2025-04-07Amend DocumentPublic
Summary: The Milan Local Division allowed Dainese's application under Rule 263 RoP to limit its claim by withdrawing all arguments related to EP 3 498 117 (following an EPO Board of Appeal limitation), while dismissing defendants' request for a costs order under Rule 265 RoP.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Limitation of claim/cause of action (Rule 263.3 RoP)
- Cost consequences of partial withdrawal
- EPO Board of Appeal limitation effect on UPC proceedings
Documents
- 36E06DD4D8F4A9A5766A4E4DF718AEC5_en.pdf2025-04-07EN