UPC_APP_8708/2024

CONNECTIVITY FAULT MANAGEMENT (CFM) IN NETWORKS WITH LINK AGGREGATION GROUP CONNECTIONS

OtherPreliminary ObjectionParis CDPreliminary objection—

This case cites

Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
295	procedural	Binding	he patent as a whole or the German portion thereof. 63. Article 30 (1) Brussels I Reg recast is not applicable. 64. In accordance with Art. 33 (10) UPCA and Rule 295 RoP, the UPC may only stay its proceedings in cases involving EPO opposition pro
49.1	procedural	Binding	foundation for staying the proceedings before this court. No Time extension 66. The deadline for the lodging of a Defence to revocation is stipulated by R. 49.1 RoP. This Rule forms part of an elaborate regime of deadlines set out in the RoP.
9.3	procedural	Binding	the same time being long enough to allow the parties to prepare and present their case in a manner suitable for the Court to deliver high-quality decisions. R. 9.3 RoP offers the Court the possibility to extend a time period referred to in the RoP

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
German Federal Court of Justice	jurisdiction	Background	basis, in the event that the Court does not decline its jurisdiction as requested in item III., that the proceedings be stayed until a final decision of the German Federal Court of Justice has been issued in the German revocation appeal proceeding
Federal Supreme Court	jurisdiction	Background	EPO. However, the preconditions outlined in this provision are clearly not met. There is neither an imminent decision expected from the EPO nor is the German Federal Supreme Court poised to deliver a prompt decision. 65. There is also no provisio

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
UPC_CFI_484/2023	procedural	Binding	[FIRST PAGES] 1 UPC_CFI-484/2023 Order of the Court of First Instance of the Unified Patent Court Central Division (Paris Seat) rejecting a Preliminary objection concerning the Preliminar

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
33 (10)	procedural	Binding	roceedings regarding the patent as a whole or the German portion thereof. 63. Article 30 (1) Brussels I Reg recast is not applicable. 64. In accordance with Art. 33 (10) UPCA and Rule 295 RoP, the UPC may only stay its proceedings in cases involv

Cited by

Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.

Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.