UPClytics
View all cases

UPC APP 9038/2025

·EP2501384: METHOD OF TREATING PROLIFERATIVE DISORDERS AND OTHER PATHOLOGICAL CONDITIONS MEDIATED BY BCR-ABL, C-KIT, DDR1, DDR2 OR PDGF-R KINASE ACTIVITY

Case details
Status
Action
Procedural application
Category
Intervention
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Marc Lauzeral
Respondents
Reps: Gregory Bacon (Bristows (Ireland) LLP); Rutger Kleemans (Freshfields); Daniela Ampollin (Trevisan & Cuonzo); Allard van Duijn (Freshfields)
Division
Milan CD
Judges
Technology
Organic Chemistry
Language
First decided
Mar 21, 2025
Decisions
  • 2025-03-21
    DismissedApplication Rop313

    The Milan Central Division dismissed Zentiva K.S. and Zentiva Portugal's application to intervene under Rule 313 RoP in infringement proceedings between Accord Healthcare and Novartis concerning EP 2 501 384. The court held that parallelism between cases or the potential impact of one judgment on another does not establish the legal interest required for intervention, and that the intervening party's requested remedies must be non-contradictory to those of the supported party.

    Legal issues:Third party intervention under Rule 313 RoPLegal interest in interventionRes judicata and inter partes effects of UPC judgmentsArt. 33 UPCA case connections and bifurcation
Documents
  • 7D549992AE02D0300AB0E8A7DA23ACE5_en.pdf2025-03-21ENGLISH