Overview · Filed: Feb 11, 2025
UPC_CFI_104/2025
FLOW CONTROL SYSTEM
RevocationMain Revocation ActionParis CDRevocationCase ClosedSettled at: Pre-merits
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.
Rules of Procedure · 4
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| RoP_rule_340 | connection joinder of proceedings | Binding | R. 340 Connection Joinder: In the interests of the proper administration of justice and of avoiding inconsistent decisions, where more than one action concerning the same patent...is pending before...different panels...the panels may by agreement...order that two or more actions shall...be heard together. |
| RoP_rule_265 | withdrawal of action | Binding | Withdrawal of the action (R. 265 RoP) |
| RoP_rule_295 | stay of proceedings for settlement | Binding | On 4 February 2026, the parties requested a stay of the proceedings pursuant to R. 295 (d) RoP because of a settlement. |
| RoP_rule_158 | security for costs | Binding | In the Reply to statement of defence/Defence to the counterclaim for infringement, IMI requests that Belparts is ordered to provide security pursuant to R. 158.1 RoP in the amount of EUR 500,000 |
EPC article · 2
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33 | jurisdiction | Binding | Article 33 of the Agreement shall be respected. |
| 69(4) | security for costs | Binding | a defendant does not have to provide security for costs in light of the clear wording of Art. 69 (4) UPCA (UPC_CoA_596/2024) |
UPC Court of Appeal · 1
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| UPC_CoA_596/2024 | security for costs — defendant not liable | Binding | a defendant does not have to provide security for costs in light of the clear wording of Art. 69 (4) UPCA (UPC_CoA_596/2024) |
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.
Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.