UPC_CFI_132/2024

Intelligent interrupt distributor

InfringementMain Infringement ActionMannheim LDInfringementCase Closed

This case cites

Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
263	amendment of infringement action during oral hearing	Binding	granting leave for such an amendment is regularly to be excluded, according to R. 263.2 (b) RoP and the right to defence.
118	costs allocation	Binding	The decision on the (recoverable) costs with regard to both the infringement action and the counterclaim for revocation is based on Art. 69 (1) (2) UPCA, R. 118.5 RoP.
12	further written submissions	Binding	Claimant requests to allow the filing of a further written submission according to R. 12.5, 36 RoP
36	further written submissions	Binding	Claimant requests to allow the filing of a further written submission according to R. 12.5, 36 RoP
333	application for review of case management order	Binding	An application for review pursuant to R. 333 RoP (App_18490/2025) is pending
263	amendment of claim / further submissions	Binding	on a regular basis, a repeated request on the same procedural issue, which has already been decided, without any change in the factual or legal situation is an abuse of law and inadmissible

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
69	costs allocation	Binding	The decision on the (recoverable) costs with regard to both the infringement action and the counterclaim for revocation is based on Art. 69 (1) (2) UPCA, R. 118.5 RoP.

Cited by

Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.

Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.