Overview · Filed: Mar 26, 2024
UPC_CFI_140/2024
METHOD AND PRODUCT FOR LOCALISED OR SPATIAL DETECTION OF NUCLEIC ACID IN A TISSUE SAMPLE
InfringementMain Infringement ActionDusseldorf LDInfringementCase Closed
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.
UPC (CFI) · 4
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| UPC_CFI_54/2023 | confidentiality order under R. 262A RoP | Persuasive | see UPC_CFI_54/2023 (LD Hamburg), Order of 3 November 2023, ORD_577703/2023 - Avago Technologies International v. Tesla Germany |
| UPC_CFI_463/2023 | confidentiality order under R. 262A RoP | Persuasive | UPC_CFI_463/2023 (LD Düsseldorf), Order of 11 March 2024, ORD_8550/2024 - 10x Genomics v. Curio Bioscience |
| UPC_CFI_463/2023 | scope of confidentiality club in summary proceedings | Persuasive | the group of persons granted access must be selected in such a way that the party affected by the preliminary order for the protection of confidential information is fully able to work (UPC_CFI_463/2023 (LD Düsseldorf), Order of 23 February 2024, ORD_9718/2024) |
| UPC_CFI_471/2023 | number of authorised representatives in confidentiality proceedings | Persuasive | connection to UPC_CFI_471/2023 (LD Mannheim), Order of 3 July 2024, ORD_33986/2024 Aylo Freesites v. DISH |
Rules of Procedure · 3
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| 262A | confidentiality order procedure | Binding | The protection of confidential information is provided for in Art. 58 UPCA and implemented in R. 262A RoP |
| 262A | formal requirements for confidentiality order | Binding | The formal requirements of R. 262A.2 and .3 RoP were complied with. |
| 262A | right to be heard before confidentiality order | Binding | The Claimant's representatives were also heard before the confidentiality order was issued, as required by R. 262A.4 RoP. |
EPC article · 2
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| Art. 82 UPCA | enforcement | Binding | INFORMATION ON ENFORCEMENT (Art. 82 UPCA, Art. 37(2) UPCS, R. 118.8, 158.2, 354, 355.4 RoP) |
| 58 | protection of confidential information | Binding | The protection of confidential information is provided for in Art. 58 UPCA and implemented in R. 262A RoP |
UPC Court of Appeal · 1
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| UPC_CoA_768/2024 | claim construction; court must independently construe claims as matter of law | Binding | As claim construction is a matter of law and the Court must independently construe the claims (UPC_CoA_768/2024, Order of 30 April 2025, Headnote 1 Insulet Corporation v EOFlow) |
courtName.other · 1
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| Directive (EU) 2016/943, Art. 9(1) and (2)(a) | protection of confidential information in judicial proceedings | Binding | Art. 9(1) and (2)(a) of Directive (EU) 2016/943 provides that, in judicial proceedings, access to documents submitted by the parties or third parties containing trade secrets or alleged trade secrets may, upon request, be restricted |
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.
Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.