UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 159/2024

Apr 3, 2024·EP2028981 · JUICE EXTRACTOR

Action number: ACT 17336/2024

Case details
Status
Case Closed (Patent infringed)Set aside on appeal, Mar 27, 2026
Action
Infringement
Category
Main infringement action
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Mannheim LD
Technology
  • Other fields
    Consumer products
Language
English
First decided
Mar 11, 2025
Last decision
May 5, 2026
Appealed
How this compares
The court's record for this kind of case, counted in first-instance rulings. A figure in brackets is the number of rulings a rate rests on.
Infringement foundMedian days to first decision
All UPC53% (62/117)124
Mannheim LDLockedLocked
Judge Peter TochtermannLockedLocked
Judge Dirk BöttcherLockedLocked
Judge Pierluigi PerrottiLockedLocked

At the UPC: Hurom Co., Ltd. (29 cases)·NUC Electronics Group (29 cases)

Decisions
  • 2026-05-05
    Infringement ActionPublic

    Summary: Following the Court of Appeal's dismissal of the underlying infringement action, the Claimant withdrew its penalty payment requests against the Defendants under R. 354.4 RoP. The withdrawal was permitted and the enforcement proceedings were declared closed, with costs of the enforcement proceedings borne by the Claimant.

    Show the legal issues (3)
    • Withdrawal of penalty payment requests under R. 354.4 RoP
    • Application of R. 265 RoP by analogy to withdrawal of penalty request
    • Costs of enforcement proceedings
  • 2025-10-02
    Infringement ActionPublic

    Summary: The Mannheim Local Division found that NUC Electronics Europe GmbH and WARMCOOK infringed claim 1 of Hurom Co. Ltd.'s EP 2 028 981 (juice extractor) in Poland, Spain and the United Kingdom, ordering damages to be assessed and full disclosure of infringing sales; costs awarded to Hurom.

    Show the legal issues (3)
    • Patent infringement (juice extractor)
    • Multi-country UPC infringement (Poland, Spain, UK)
    • Damages and disclosure order
  • 2025-03-11
    Infringement ActionPublic

    Summary: The Mannheim Local Division ordered a separation of proceedings under Rules 302.1, 303.2 and 340.2 RoP, splitting off claims related to Poland, Spain, Turkey, and the UK pending guidance from the ECJ (Case C-339/22) on international jurisdiction under the Brussels Ia Regulation.

    Show the legal issues (4)
    • Separation of proceedings (Rule 302.1 RoP)
    • ECJ reference C-339/22 (BSH Hausgeräte)
    • International jurisdiction under Brussels Ia Regulation
    • UPC jurisdiction for non-UPCA states
  • 2025-03-11

    Summary: Hurom's patent EP 2 028 981 (slow juicer) was found infringed by NUC Electronics Europe GmbH and WARMCOOK. An injunction was granted covering France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Denmark and Romania. Defendants were ordered to pay damages (amount to be determined), provide information, destroy/recall infringing products, and pay EUR 56,000 in interim legal costs. The court also addressed the intertemporal application of UPCA substantive law to acts committed before and after 1 June 2023. Partial dismissal of remaining requests. Value in dispute set at EUR 675,000.

    Show the legal issues (4)
    • Intertemporal application of UPCA substantive law vs national law to acts before and after 1 June 2023
    • Patent infringement of slow juicer device
    • Scope of information right under Art. 67 and 68 UPCA
    • Long-arm jurisdiction covering non-CMS territories
Document titleDatePublic
Other Documents2026-07-06Not public
Order2026-05-05Not public
Order2026-05-05Public
Communication2026-04-13Not public
Receipt2026-04-10Not public
Cover sheet2026-04-10Not public
Application document Claimant2026-04-10Not public
Receipt2026-03-31Not public
Cover sheet2026-03-31Not public
Document Defendant2026-03-31Not public
Plain-English summary

Hurom Co., Ltd. succeeded in its infringement action against NUC Electronics Europe GmbH and WARMCOOK for infringement of claim 1 of EP 2 028 981 (slow juicer/juice extractor) in France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Denmark, and Romania at the Mannheim Local Division. The court issued an injunction, ordered damages, disclosure of sales information, destruction and recall of infringing products, and EUR 56,000 in interim legal costs, while establishing key principles on the intertemporal application of UPCA substantive law to ongoing infringement acts.

Accepted arguments
What the court agreed with — by party.
  • Direct infringement of claim 1 of EP 2 028 981 by NUC Electronics Europe GmbH and WARMCOOK in France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Denmark and Romania

    ClaimantLegal basis: Art. 25(a) UPCA

    Note: The court found literal infringement of the juice extractor's claim 1 by the defendants' products in the named Contracting Member States and granted injunctive relief.

  • UPCA substantive law applies to ongoing infringement acts continued after 1 June 2023, even if started before entry into force

    ClaimantLegal basis: Art. 25 UPCA

    Note: Court established that for ongoing acts continuing after 1 June 2023, UPCA applies; parties may rely on more-favourable national law for acts before that date.

  • Right to information under Art. 67 UPCA encompasses time periods before UPCA entry into force

    ClaimantLegal basis: Art. 67 UPCA; Art. 68(3) UPCA; R. 191 RoP

    Note: Court held that the information remedy extends to pre-UPCA periods despite the intertemporal boundary.

Rejected arguments
What the court did not agree with — and why.
  • Remaining requests beyond injunction, damages, information, destruction, and recall

    Claimant

    Reason: Action dismissed in other respects; no detail in excerpt as to specific rejected requests beyond partial dismissal language.