View all cases
UPC CFI 1624/2025
—
- Case details
- Status—ActionApplication for costsCategoryCosts Assessments
- Parties
- Claimants—Respondents—
- Division
- Munich LD
- Judges
- Matthias Zigann · Presiding Judge
- Edger Brinkman · Legally Qualified Judge
- Tobias Pichlmaier · Legally Qualified Judge
- Graham Ashley · Technically Qualified Judge
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Jan 13, 2026
Decisions
- 2026-01-13CostsApplication For Costs
The Munich Local Division (in German) granted the claimant re-establishment of rights under R. 320 RoP for missing the deadline to initiate cost proceedings following a cost ratio decision, finding an excusable misunderstanding of the legal situation despite legal representation; a dissenting opinion was appended.
Legal issues:Re-establishment of rights for missed cost proceedings deadline (R. 320 RoP)Due care standard in cost ratio situationsDissenting opinion (Art. 36 Statute) - 2026-01-13CostsApplication For Costs
The Munich Local Division (English version) granted the claimant re-establishment of rights under R. 320 RoP for missing the deadline to initiate cost proceedings, with a dissenting opinion holding the application should be inadmissible for lack of legal interest.
Legal issues:Re-establishment of rights (R. 320 RoP)Due care in cost ratio situationsDissenting opinion (Art. 36 Statute)
Documents
- 2026-01-13%20UPC_CFI_114-2024%20und%20448_2024%20-%20Wiedereinsetzung%20%28002%29.pdf2026-01-13DE
- 2026-01-13%20UPC_CFI_114-2024%20und%20448_2024%20-%20Wiedereinsetzung_DEEN.pdf2026-01-13EN