UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 1624/2025

Case details
Status
—
Action
Application for costs
Category
Costs assessments
Parties
Claimants
—
Representatives
Respondents
—
Representatives
Division
Munich LD
Language
—
First decided
Jan 13, 2026
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
Median days to first decision
All UPC124
Munich LDLocked
Judge Matthias ZigannLocked
Judge Edger BrinkmanLocked
Judge Tobias PichlmaierLocked
Judge Graham AshleyLocked
Decisions
  • 2026-01-13
    Application For CostsPublic

    Summary: The Munich Local Division (in German) granted the claimant re-establishment of rights under R. 320 RoP for missing the deadline to initiate cost proceedings following a cost ratio decision, finding an excusable misunderstanding of the legal situation despite legal representation; a dissenting opinion was appended.

    Show the legal issues (3)
    • Re-establishment of rights for missed cost proceedings deadline (R. 320 RoP)
    • Due care standard in cost ratio situations
    • Dissenting opinion (Art. 36 Statute)
Documents
  • 2026-01-13%20UPC_CFI_114-2024%20und%20448_2024%20-%20Wiedereinsetzung%20%28002%29.pdf2026-01-13DE
  • 2026-01-13%20UPC_CFI_114-2024%20und%20448_2024%20-%20Wiedereinsetzung_DEEN.pdf2026-01-13EN