UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 1928/2025

Dec 10, 2025·EP3001984 +1 more: METHOD FOR CONTROLLING AN ORTHOPAEDIC JOINT

Case details
Status
Written Phase
Action
Provisional measures
Category
Provisional Measures
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Sören Dahm (Kather Augenstein); Robert Knaps (Kather Augenstein); Nicole Schopp (Kather Augenstein); Christoph Heringlake (Kather Augenstein); Kai Stornebel (Gramm, Lins & Partner Patent- und Rechtsanwälte PartGmbH)
Respondents
Reps: Alexander Bulling (DREISS Patentanwälte Stuttgart); Matthias Sonntag (Gleiss Lutz Hoots Hirsch PartmbB Rechtsanwälte); Mischa Krumm (Gleiss Lutz Hoots Hirsch PartmbB Rechtsanwälte)
Division
Dusseldorf LD
Technology
Pharmaceutical & Medical
Language
German
First decided
May 7, 2026
Claims
At issueclaim 1 (restricted form — limited to prosthetic knee joint with alternating stair-ascending special function)
Not infringedclaim 1 (restricted form)
Notes: Infringement of restricted claim 1 (indirect/contributory) could not be established with requisite certainty. The court did not rule on validity (legal existence/Rechtsbestand) as it was not decisive given the finding on infringement and urgency.
Decisions
  • 2026-05-07
    PI deniedPreliminary injunctionApplication for provisional measures

    The Local Division Düsseldorf dismissed the application for provisional measures filed by Ottobock against Wilhelm Julius Teufel GmbH and MedEnvoy Global BV concerning patent EP 3 001 984 B1. The court found that infringement could not be established with the required certainty because the accused product's stair-climbing mode is triggered by an artificial 'donkey-kick' movement rather than natural walking motions as required by the patent claim. Additionally, the court could not exclude that Ottobock delayed unreasonably in bringing the application, having likely been aware of potential infringement since at least early July 2025 but not filing until December 2025.

    Legal issues:Whether the accused product (Knreuro microprocessor knee joint) infringes claim 1 of EP 3 001 984 B1 (indirect/contributory infringement)Claim construction of 'criteria' (Kriterien) aggregating multiple parameters for comparison versus sequential threshold comparisons of individual parametersWhether the stair-ascending mode of the accused product is triggered by natural/intuitive prosthetic movement or by artificial deliberate activation movements ('Donkey-Kick')Unreasonable delay (unangemessenes Zuwarten) under R. 211.4 RoP — whether claimant knew or should have known of potential infringement significantly earlier than the filing dateWhether MedEnvoy Global BV as EU regulatory representative (MDR Art. 11) qualifies as an intermediary (Mittelsperson) under Art. 63(1), 62(1) UPCAAdmissibility of late submissions by respondents pursuant to R. 9.1, 209.1(a) RoP
Documents
Document titleDatePublic
Final Order2026-05-07Public
action.phaseChange.caseClose2026-05-07Not public
action.issueDecision.decision2026-05-07Not public
Final Order2026-05-07Not public
Hearing recording reference document2026-04-23Not public
action.phaseChange.oralPhaseOpen2026-04-21Not public
Other Documents2026-04-21Public
Receipt2026-04-14Not public
Cover sheet2026-04-14Not public
Exhibit Applicant2026-04-14Not public
Exhibit Applicant2026-04-14Not public
Submission Applicant2026-04-14Not public
Receipt2026-04-10Not public
Cover sheet2026-04-10Not public
Document2026-04-10Not public
action.issueOrder.order2026-04-10Not public
Order2026-04-10Public
Receipt2026-04-08Not public
Cover sheet2026-04-08Not public
Document2026-04-08Not public
Receipt2026-03-31Not public
Cover sheet2026-03-31Not public
Document2026-03-31Not public
action.communication.general2026-03-25Not public
Receipt2026-03-23Not public
Cover sheet2026-03-23Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-03-23Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-03-23Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-03-23Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-03-23Not public
Application document Defendant2026-03-23Not public
Receipt2026-03-02Not public
Cover sheet2026-03-02Not public
Statement of rejoinder2026-03-02Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-03-02Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-03-02Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-03-02Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-03-02Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-03-02Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-03-02Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-03-02Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-03-02Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-03-02Not public
Receipt2026-02-09Not public
Cover sheet2026-02-09Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2026-02-09Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2026-02-09Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2026-02-09Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2026-02-09Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2026-02-09Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2026-02-09Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2026-02-09Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2026-02-09Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2026-02-09Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2026-02-09Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2026-02-09Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2026-02-09Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2026-02-09Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2026-02-09Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2026-02-09Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2026-02-09Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2026-02-09Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2026-02-09Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2026-02-09Not public
Statement of reply2026-02-09Not public
Other Documents2026-02-04Not public
action.issueOrder.order2026-01-27Not public
Order2026-01-27Not public
Receipt2026-01-19Not public
Cover sheet2026-01-19Not public
Statement of defence2026-01-19Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2026-01-19Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2026-01-19Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2026-01-19Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2026-01-19Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2026-01-19Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2026-01-19Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2026-01-19Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2026-01-19Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2026-01-19Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2026-01-19Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2026-01-19Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2026-01-19Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2026-01-19Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2026-01-19Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2026-01-19Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2026-01-19Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2026-01-19Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2026-01-19Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2026-01-19Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2026-01-19Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2026-01-19Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2026-01-19Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2026-01-19Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2026-01-19Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2026-01-19Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2026-01-19Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2026-01-19Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2026-01-19Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2026-01-19Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2026-01-19Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2026-01-19Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2026-01-19Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2026-01-19Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2026-01-19Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2026-01-19Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2026-01-19Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2026-01-19Not public
action.publishOrderDecision.case2026-01-16Not public
Service Receipt/Service Document2026-01-16Not public
Service Receipt/Service Document2026-01-16Not public
action.issueOrder.order2026-01-07Not public
Order2026-01-07Not public
Receipt2026-01-06Not public
Cover sheet2026-01-06Not public
Document2026-01-06Not public
action.communication.general2026-01-05Not public
Receipt2026-01-05Not public
Cover sheet2026-01-05Not public
Application document Defendant2026-01-05Not public
Receipt2025-12-30Not public
Cover sheet2025-12-30Not public
Other document Claimant2025-12-30Not public
action.communication.general2025-12-23Not public
Receipt2025-12-23Not public
Cover sheet2025-12-23Not public
Application document Defendant2025-12-23Not public
action.issueOrder.order2025-12-12Not public
Order2025-12-12Not public
Cover sheet2025-12-10Not public
Fee2025-12-10Not public
Application for provisional measures2025-12-10Not public
Other documents2025-12-10Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-10Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-10Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-10Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-10Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-10Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-10Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-10Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-10Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-10Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-10Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-10Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-10Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-10Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-10Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-10Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-10Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-10Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-10Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-10Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-10Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-10Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-10Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-10Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-10Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-10Not public
Proof of payment2025-12-10Not public
Receipt2025-12-10Not public
Accepted arguments
What the court agreed with — by party.
  • The patent's claimed 'criteria' must reflect natural movement patterns allowing intuitive, automatic control — not artificial activation movements — based on the patent description's explicit distinction from prior art requiring conscious switching movements

    RespondentLegal basis: Art. 69 EPC and Protocol on Interpretation; claim construction from perspective of skilled person in context of entire patent specification
  • The accused product's stair-climbing mode is triggered by the 'Donkey-Kick' — a deliberate, conspicuous backward and forward hip movement — which constitutes an artificial activation movement, not a natural gait parameter, so feature 1.2b) is not met

    RespondentLegal basis: R. 211.2 RoP — infringement not established with requisite certainty
  • Claimant could not exclude unreasonable delay: the accused product was exhibited at US trade fairs in autumn 2024/early 2025 and marketed in European trade press from February 2025, such that claimant should have known of potential infringement no later than early July 2025, but did not file until December 2025

    RespondentLegal basis: R. 211.4 RoP
Rejected arguments
What the court did not agree with — and why.
  • An IF-function with three parameters compared sequentially via AND-logic and combined threshold checks constitutes 'criteria aggregating multiple parameters' within the meaning of feature 1.2b)

    ClaimantLegal basis: Claim construction of 'Kriterien' under Art. 69 EPC
  • The stair-climbing mode for subsequent steps (beyond the initial step) uses movements comparable to natural prosthetic gait and thus satisfies feature 1.2b)

    ClaimantLegal basis: R. 211.2 RoP
  • Claimant acted with sufficient urgency by only learning of potential infringement upon purchasing the device in October 2025 and conducting gait-lab tests in November 2025 before filing in December 2025

    ClaimantLegal basis: R. 211.4 RoP