View all cases
UPC CFI 2045/2025
Dec 18, 2025·EP2803191 · METHOD AND DEVICE FOR CODING AN IMAGE BLOCK, CORRESPONDING METHOD AND DECODING DEVICE
- Case details
- StatusWritten PhaseActionInfringementCategoryMain infringement action
- Parties
- ClaimantsRepresentatives
- Lisa Rieth-Arnold Ruess
- Julius Winkler-Arnold Ruess
- Cordula Schumacher-Arnold Ruess
- Arno Riße-Arnold Ruess
- Tuğçe Altun-Arnold Ruess
Respondents- Amazon.com, Inc.Operating co.
- Amazon Europe Core S.à r.l.Operating co.
- Amazon EU S.à r.l.Operating co.
- Amazon Technologies, Inc.Operating co.
- Amazon Media EU S.à.r.l.Operating co.
- Amazon.com Services LLCOperating co.
Representatives- Klaus Haft-Hoyng Rokh Monegier
- Martin Köhler-Hoyng Rokh Monegier
- Sven Krause-Hoyng Rokh Monegier
- Nico Schur-Hoyng Rokh Monegier
- Michiel de Baat-Hoyng Rokh Monegier
- Andrew Lin-Hoyng Rokh Monegier
- Division
- Mannheim LD
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringAudio-visual technology
- Language
- English
- First decided
- Jan 26, 2026
How this compares
The court's record for this kind of case, counted in first-instance rulings. A figure in brackets is the number of rulings a rate rests on.
| Infringement found | Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|---|
| All UPC | 53% (62/117) | 124 |
| Mannheim LD | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Peter Tochtermann | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Sender Tobias | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Peter Agergaard | Locked | Locked |
At the UPC: InterDigital Group (34 cases)·Amazon Group (22 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 1 other proceedings
2 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Mannheim LD·2025
Decisions
- 2026-01-26Infringement ActionPublic
Summary: Order of the President of the Court of First Instance granting Amazon's application under R.323 RoP to change the language of proceedings from German to English (the language in which the patent was granted). The court found that none of the defendants is based in Germany, that they all require English for internal coordination, and that the circumstances of the case and fairness under Art.49(5) UPCA justified the change.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Change of language of proceedings (Art.49(5) UPCA, R.323 RoP)
- Fairness assessment for language change
- Internal working language and coordination of multinational defendants
Documents
Show all 159 documents| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Order | 2026-07-10 | Not public |
| Order | 2026-07-10 | Public |
| Receipt | 2026-07-10 | Not public |
| Cover sheet | 2026-07-10 | Not public |
| Receipt | 2026-07-10 | Not public |
| Cover sheet | 2026-07-10 | Not public |
| Application document Claimant | 2026-07-10 | Not public |
| Document | 2026-07-10 | Not public |
| Order | 2026-05-26 | Not public |
| Order | 2026-05-26 | Not public |