UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 2070/2025

Dec 19, 2025·EP2937706: VOLTAGE DETECTION MEMBER AND BATTERY MODULE INCLUDING SAME

Case details
Status
Written Phase
Action
Infringement
Category
Main Infringement Action
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Anne-Charlotte le Bihan (Bird & Bird LLP); Thierry Lautier (Bird & Bird LLP); Laurent Labatte (Bird & Bird LLP); Eva Kessi (Bird & Bird LLP)
Respondents
Reps: Christian Dekoninck (Taylor Wessing); Laura Coucke (Taylor Wessing)
Division
Paris LD
Technology
Automotive · EV Powertrain · Automotive
Language
English
First decided
Apr 14, 2026
Last decision
May 27, 2026
Decisions
  • 2026-05-27
    Infringement Action

    The Paris Local Division ordered BMS Innovations, LLC (claimant in the main infringement proceedings) to provide security for costs of EUR 300,000 within one month, pursuant to Rule 158 RoP and Article 69(4) UPCA. The court assessed the total value of proceedings at EUR 8 million (infringement action EUR 4 million plus revocation counterclaim at equal value) and set the security at 50% of the EUR 600,000 recoverable costs ceiling.

    Legal issues:Security for costs under Rule 158 RoP and Article 69(4) UPCAFinancial capacity of non-practicing entity claimantValuation of infringement action and revocation counterclaim for recoverable costs ceilingProportionate amount of security for costsTimeframe for payment of ordered security
  • 2026-04-14
    Infringement Action

    The judge-rapporteur ruled on a preliminary objection (R.19 RoP) concerning international jurisdiction. The UPC's jurisdiction over Defendants 1 and 2 (domiciled in China) for alleged infringing acts in the UK is deferred to the decision on the merits, while the preliminary objection against Defendant 7 (BYD UK, domiciled in the UK) is upheld — the Paris Local Division has no international jurisdiction over a defendant domiciled in a third country who is not alleged to have committed any infringing act within EU/UPC territory. The request for a preliminary ruling referral to the CJEU is rejected.

    Legal issues:International jurisdiction over defendants domiciled in third countries (non-UPC, non-EU)Application of Article 8(1) Brussels I bis (Regulation 1215/2012) to multiple defendantsApplication of Article 71b(2) Brussels I bis to defendants domiciled outside the EUUPC jurisdiction for alleged infringing acts committed exclusively in a third country (UK)Risk of irreconcilable judgments as basis for long-arm jurisdictionAdmissibility and timing of preliminary objection (R.19 RoP)Referral to CJEU for preliminary ruling on Brussels I bis interpretationWhether oral hearing is required in preliminary objection proceedings (R.20.1 RoP)
Documents
Document titleDatePublic
action.issueOrder.order2026-05-27Not public
Order2026-05-27Public
Receipt2026-05-26Not public
Cover sheet2026-05-26Not public
Application document Claimant2026-05-26Not public
Receipt2026-05-22Not public
Cover sheet2026-05-22Not public
Statement of defence2026-05-22Not public
action.communication.general2026-05-06Not public
Receipt2026-05-05Not public
Cover sheet2026-05-05Not public
Application document Defendant2026-05-05Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-04Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-05-04Not public
action.communication.general2026-05-04Not public
action.issueOrder.order2026-04-14Not public
Order2026-04-14Not public
Receipt2026-03-30Not public
Cover sheet2026-03-30Not public
Application document Claimant2026-03-30Not public
action.communication.general2026-03-17Not public
Receipt2026-03-16Not public
Cover sheet2026-03-16Not public
Application document Defendant2026-03-16Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-03-16Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-03-16Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-03-16Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-03-16Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-03-16Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-03-16Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-03-16Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-03-16Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-03-16Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-03-16Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-03-16Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-03-16Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-03-16Not public
action.publishOrderDecision.case2026-02-17Not public
action.issueOrder.order2026-02-16Not public
Order2026-02-16Not public
Receipt2026-02-13Not public
Cover sheet2026-02-13Not public
Application document Claimant2026-02-13Not public
Receipt2026-02-12Not public
Cover sheet2026-02-12Not public
Application document Defendant2026-02-12Not public
action.communication.general2026-02-09Not public
Service Receipt/Service Document2026-01-23Not public
Service Receipt/Service Document2026-01-23Not public
Service Receipt/Service Document2026-01-23Not public
Service Receipt/Service Document2026-01-23Not public
Receipt2025-12-30Not public
Cover sheet2025-12-30Not public
Other document Claimant2025-12-30Not public
Other document Claimant2025-12-30Not public
action.communication.general2025-12-29Not public
Receipt2025-12-19Not public
Cover sheet2025-12-19Not public
Fee2025-12-19Not public
Proof of payment2025-12-19Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-19Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-19Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-19Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-19Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-19Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-19Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-19Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-19Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-19Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-19Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-19Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-19Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-19Not public
Exhibit document Claimant2025-12-19Not public
Statement of claim2025-12-19Not public
Accepted arguments
What the court agreed with — by party.
  • The UPC lacks international jurisdiction over Defendant 7 (BYD UK) because it is domiciled in a third country (UK) and the alleged infringing acts take place exclusively in the UK — there is no connection with UPC or EU territory, so jurisdiction cannot be based on Art. 4, Art. 7(2), or Art. 8(1) Brussels I bis

    RespondentLegal basis: Art. 4(1), Art. 7(2), Art. 8(1), Art. 71b(2) Brussels I bis (Regulation 1215/2012); Art. 31 UPCA
  • The question of jurisdiction over Defendants 1 and 2 (China-domiciled) for UK infringement acts is closely connected to claims against EU-domiciled defendants and should be examined at the merits stage to avoid risk of irreconcilable judgments

    ClaimantLegal basis: Art. 8(1), Art. 71b(2) Brussels I bis; R.21.1 RoP
Rejected arguments
What the court did not agree with — and why.
  • Article 8(1) Brussels I bis can confer jurisdiction on the UPC over Defendant 7 (BYD UK) for acts committed exclusively in the UK, given the close connection with claims against other defendants

    ClaimantLegal basis: Art. 8(1), Art. 71b(2) Brussels I bis
  • A preliminary ruling referral to the CJEU is necessary on the interpretation of Art. 8(1) and Art. 71b(2) Brussels I bis regarding third-country defendants and irreconcilable judgments

    RespondentLegal basis: Art. 267 TFEU
  • An oral hearing should be held before ruling on the preliminary objection

    ClaimantLegal basis: R.20.1 RoP