UPC_CFI_213/2025

SURGICAL, TORQUE-TRANSMITTING INSTRUMENT INCLUDING ASSOCIATED TOOL

Provisional measuresProvisional MeasuresDusseldorf LDProvisional measuresCase Closed

This case cites

Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
RoP_rule_116	oral hearing procedure	Binding	Schlagwörter: R. 116 VerfO; R. 171 Abs. 2 VerfO; R. 210 Abs. 3 VerfO; Abwesenheit in der mündlichen Verhandlung
RoP_rule_171	burden of proof / uncontested facts	Binding	If the defendant fails to do so and merely makes general statements about the applicant's burden of proof, the corresponding submission of the claimant is deemed undisputed, R. 171.2 RoP.
RoP_rule_210	oral hearing procedure	Binding	Schlagwörter: R. 116 VerfO; R. 171 Abs. 2 VerfO; R. 210 Abs. 3 VerfO; Abwesenheit in der mündlichen Verhandlung

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
62(3)	provisional measures / preservation order	Binding	die andauert, bis über das Bestehen eines Vernichtungsanspruchs zwischen den Parteien rechtskräftig entschieden oder eine einvernehmliche Regelung herbeigeführt worden ist (Art. 62 Abs. 3 EPGÜ)

Cited by

Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.

Cited in	Date	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
UPC_APP_33210/2025 Dusseldorf LD	Sep 3, 2025	default procedure when defendant fails to lodge objection to PI application	Binding	follow up to UPC_CFI_213/2025 (LD Düsseldorf), Order of 10 July 2025, headnote 1 and mn. 213 - 214 – Aesculap v Shanghai International Holding
UPC_CFI_449/2025 Dusseldorf LD	Nov 28, 2025	default PI order where defendant failed to lodge objection after good service	Binding	(follow-up to UPC_CFI_213/2025 (LD Düsseldorf), Order of 10 July 2025, headnote 1 and mn. 213 - 214 – Aesculap v Shanghai International Holding and Order of 3 September 2025, headnote – Hewlett-Packard v Rentmeister).