UPC CFI 219/2023
Jul 31, 2023·EP2568724 SEP · Radio Communication Device and Radio Communication Method
Action number: ACT 545615/2023
- Case details
- StatusCase ClosedActionInfringementCategoryMain infringement action
- Parties
- Claimants
- Panasonic Holdings CorporationOperating co.
Representatives- Christopher Weber-Kather Augenstein
Respondents- Xiaomi Inc.Operating co.
- Beijing Xiaomi Mobile Software Co. Ltd.Operating co.
- Xiaomi Technology Germany GmbHOperating co.
- Xiaomi Technology France S.A.S.Operating co.
- Xiaomi Technology Italy S.R.L.Operating co.
- Xiaomi Technology Netherlands B.V.Operating co.
- Xiaomi H.K. LimitedOperating co.
- Xiaomi Communications Co., Ltd.Operating co.
- Odiporo GmbHOperating co.
- Shamrock Mobile GmbHOperating co.
Representatives- Eva Acker-Freshfields
- Prinz zu Waldeck Und Pyrmont
- Corin Gittinger-Freshfields
- Division
- Mannheim LD
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringTelecommunications · Digital communication
- Language
- German
- First decided
- Dec 8, 2023
- Last decision
- Sep 16, 2024
| Infringement found | Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|---|
| All UPC | 53% (62/117) | 124 |
| Mannheim LD | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Peter Tochtermann | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Edger Brinkman | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Dirk Böttcher | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Klaus Loibner | Locked | Locked |
At the UPC: Panasonic Group (81 cases)·Xiaomi Group (92 cases)
This dispute contains 13 other proceedings
UPC CoA 543/2024·UPC CFI 332/2024·CC 591342/2023·UPC CFI 331/2024·ORD 25614/2024 and 8 more
4 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
UPC CoA 298/2024·CC 596895/2023·UPC CoA 476/2023·UPC CFI 210/2023
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Mannheim LD·2023
- 2024-09-16Infringement ActionPublic
Summary: Mannheim Local Division issued a pre-trial procedural order for oral hearing preparation in Panasonic v Xiaomi (UPC_CFI_219/2023), an SEP infringement case concerning EP 2 568 724. The order set a hearing schedule over multiple days (technical issues on day 1, FRAND on day 2), addressed admissibility of document FBD-T13, confidentiality arrangements for FRAND discussions, submission of visual aids, language of pleadings, and set the value in dispute at EUR 8,000,000 for UPC_CFI_219/2023.
Show the legal issues (4)
- SEP/FRAND infringement
- Oral hearing organisation in complex SEP case
- Confidentiality in FRAND proceedings
- Admissibility of EPO Board of Appeal decisions as exhibits
- 2023-12-08Infringement ActionPublic
Summary: The Mannheim Local Division issued a procedural order addressing the validity of service of the statement of claim on Xiaomi entities domiciled in China and Hong Kong, with Panasonic Holdings arguing that service at Xiaomi Technology Germany GmbH's address was effective for all group companies given their integrated corporate structure.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Service on foreign (Chinese/HK) defendants via German subsidiary
- Corporate group service
- Rule 275.2 RoP
| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Case Closure Formal Check | 2025-05-14 | Not public |
| Outcome of the Order | 2025-02-04 | Not public |
| rueck | 2025-02-04 | Public |
| Outcome of the Order | 2025-02-03 | Not public |
| rueck | 2025-02-03 | Public |
| Outcome of the Order | 2025-02-03 | Not public |
| rueck | 2025-02-03 | Public |
| Headnote-and-Keywords | 2025-02-03 | Not public |
| Outcome of the Order | 2025-02-03 | Not public |
| Zustimmung Ruecknahme | 2025-02-03 | Public |