UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 219/2023

Jul 31, 2023·EP2568724 SEP · Radio Communication Device and Radio Communication Method

Action number: ACT 545615/2023

Case details
Status
Case Closed
Action
Infringement
Category
Main infringement action
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Mannheim LD
Technology
  • Electrical engineering
    Telecommunications · Digital communication
Language
German
First decided
Dec 8, 2023
Last decision
Sep 16, 2024
How this compares
The court's record for this kind of case, counted in first-instance rulings. A figure in brackets is the number of rulings a rate rests on.
Infringement foundMedian days to first decision
All UPC53% (62/117)124
Mannheim LDLockedLocked
Judge Peter TochtermannLockedLocked
Judge Edger BrinkmanLockedLocked
Judge Dirk BöttcherLockedLocked
Judge Klaus LoibnerLockedLocked

At the UPC: Panasonic Group (81 cases)·Xiaomi Group (92 cases)

This dispute contains 13 other proceedings

UPC CoA 543/2024·UPC CFI 332/2024·CC 591342/2023·UPC CFI 331/2024·ORD 25614/2024 and 8 more

4 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent

UPC CoA 298/2024·CC 596895/2023·UPC CoA 476/2023·UPC CFI 210/2023

Start a free trial to see how each one ended.

More cases: Mannheim LD·2023

Decisions
  • 2024-09-16
    Infringement ActionPublic

    Summary: Mannheim Local Division issued a pre-trial procedural order for oral hearing preparation in Panasonic v Xiaomi (UPC_CFI_219/2023), an SEP infringement case concerning EP 2 568 724. The order set a hearing schedule over multiple days (technical issues on day 1, FRAND on day 2), addressed admissibility of document FBD-T13, confidentiality arrangements for FRAND discussions, submission of visual aids, language of pleadings, and set the value in dispute at EUR 8,000,000 for UPC_CFI_219/2023.

    Show the legal issues (4)
    • SEP/FRAND infringement
    • Oral hearing organisation in complex SEP case
    • Confidentiality in FRAND proceedings
    • Admissibility of EPO Board of Appeal decisions as exhibits
  • 2023-12-08
    Infringement ActionPublic

    Summary: The Mannheim Local Division issued a procedural order addressing the validity of service of the statement of claim on Xiaomi entities domiciled in China and Hong Kong, with Panasonic Holdings arguing that service at Xiaomi Technology Germany GmbH's address was effective for all group companies given their integrated corporate structure.

    Show the legal issues (3)
    • Service on foreign (Chinese/HK) defendants via German subsidiary
    • Corporate group service
    • Rule 275.2 RoP
Document titleDatePublic
Case Closure Formal Check2025-05-14Not public
Outcome of the Order2025-02-04Not public
rueck2025-02-04Public
Outcome of the Order2025-02-03Not public
rueck2025-02-03Public
Outcome of the Order2025-02-03Not public
rueck2025-02-03Public
Headnote-and-Keywords2025-02-03Not public
Outcome of the Order2025-02-03Not public
Zustimmung Ruecknahme2025-02-03Public