UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CoA 543/2024

Sep 25, 2024·EP3096315 SEP +2 more · DEVICE AND METHOD FOR EXECUTION OF HUFFMAN CODING

Case details
Status
Case Closed
Action
Appeal
Category
Main appeal
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Court of Appeal
Technology
  • Electrical engineering
    Digital communication · Telecommunications · Computer technology
Language
German
First decided
Sep 30, 2024
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
Median days to first decision
All UPC124
Judge Rian KaldenLocked

At the UPC: Xiaomi Group (92 cases)·Panasonic Group (81 cases)

Related cases

This dispute contains 19 other proceedings

UPC CoA 86/2024·CC 591342/2023·CC 594274/2023·CC 594296/2023·UPC CFI 218/2023 and 14 more

16 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent

UPC CFI 332/2024·UPC CoA 298/2024·CC 4797/2024·CC 1354/2024·CC 596895/2023 and 11 more

Start a free trial to see how each one ended.

More cases: Court of Appeal·2024

Decisions
  • 2024-09-30
    Request for a discretionary review (RoP 220.3)Public

    Summary: The Court of Appeal (single judge) denied Xiaomi's request for discretionary review of three first-instance orders concerning the extension of a time limit under R.29(d) RoP for filing a rejoinder in three parallel infringement proceedings brought by Panasonic before the Local Division Mannheim.

    Show the legal issues (4)
    • Discretionary review (R.220.3 RoP)
    • Extension of time limits (R.29(d) RoP)
    • Redacted pleadings
    • Procedural fairness
Documents
Document titleDatePublic
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2024-09-30Not public
Outcome of the Order2024-09-30Not public
Final Order discretionary review2024-09-30Public
Panel-Appointment2024-09-30Not public
Anlage FBD 132024-09-25Not public
24-09-25 - Antrag R.220.32024-09-25Not public