UPC_CFI_231/2024

ANALYTE SENSOR DEVICES, CONNECTIONS, AND METHODS

RevocationMain Revocation ActionParis CDRevocationCase Closed

This case cites

Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
75.3	novelty — R.75(3) does not apply when counterclaim follows completed central revocation oral hearing	Binding	Rule 75(3) 'RoP' must be interpreted as not applying when a counterclaim for revocation concerning the same patent is brought in a subsequent infringement action before a local division of the UPC, provided that the oral hearing in an earlier revocation action before a central division has already taken place.

Cited by

Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.

Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.