UPC CFI 256/2025
Mar 24, 2025·EP3685783 Unitary patent · ENDOLUMINAL LASER ABLATION DEVICE FOR TREATING VEINS
- Case details
- StatusWritten PhaseActionGenericCategoryGeneric
- Parties
- Claimants
- S.I.A. LIGHTGUIDE InternationalOperating co.
- Light Guide Optics Germany GmbHOperating co.
Representatives- Jörg Schmidt-Wildanger Kehrwald Graf von Schwerin & Partner mbB
- Jan-Casper Maiers-Wildanger Kehrwald Graf von Schwerin & Partner mbB
Respondents- biolitec Holding GmbH & Co. KGOperating co.
Representatives- Paul Szynka-CBH Rechtsanwälte
- Hannes Jacobsen-CBH Rechtsanwälte
- Alexander Fischer-CBH Rechtsanwälte
- Division
- Dusseldorf LD
- Technology
- InstrumentsMedical technology
- Language
- German
- First decided
- Aug 13, 2026
- EPO Opposition
- Light Guide Optics Germany GmbHAdmissible2024-07-19
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Dusseldorf LD | Locked |
| Judge Berenice Thom | Locked |
| Judge Mojca Mlakar | Locked |
| Judge Ingo Rinken | Locked |
At the UPC: S.I.A. LIGHTGUIDE International (6 cases)·biolitec Holding GmbH & Co. KG (7 cases)
This dispute contains 5 other proceedings
UPC CFI 155/2025·UPC CFI 714/2024·UPC CoA 540/2024·UPC CFI 486/2024·UPC APP 67626/2024
1 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Dusseldorf LD·2025
- 2026-08-13
Summary: The Dusseldorf Local Division stayed the cost-determination proceedings UPC_CFI_256/2025 under R. 295(m) RoP until the infringement action and revocation counterclaim pending before the Munich Local Division (UPC_CFI_714/2024, UPC_CFI_155/2025) are finally decided, and set the value of the earlier provisional-measures proceedings UPC_CFI_486/2024 at EUR 1,000,000.
Show the legal issues (4)
- stay of cost-determination proceedings pending the main action
- R. 295(m) RoP
- Art. 69 UPCA
- value in dispute of provisional measures
- 2026-08-13
Summary: On the joint application of both parties, the Dusseldorf Local Division classified as confidential under Art. 58 UPCA and R. 262.2 RoP the redacted passages of the cost-determination application and the reply concerning lawyers' hourly rates, time spent and billing detail.
Show the legal issues (3)
- confidentiality of hourly rates and billing detail
- Art. 58 UPCA
- R. 262.2 RoP
| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Publication of order | 2026-08-13 | Not public |
| Publication | 2026-08-13 | Not public |
| Publication of order | 2026-08-13 | Not public |
| Written procedure closed | 2026-08-13 | Not public |
| Order | 2026-08-13 | Not public |
| Order | 2026-08-13 | Public |
| Order | 2026-08-13 | Not public |
| Order | 2026-08-13 | Public |
| Communication | 2026-04-16 | Not public |
| Receipt | 2026-04-16 | Not public |