Overview · Filed: Apr 22, 2025
UPC_CFI_337/2025
FINING OF BOROALUMINO SILICATE GLASSES
RevocationMain Revocation ActionMunich CDRevocationCase Closed
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.
Rules of Procedure · 2
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| 105.5 | interim conference order | Binding | This order sets out the decisions taken at the interim conference as required by Rule 105.5 of the Rules of Procedure ("RoP") of the Unified Patent Court ("UPC") |
| 118.5 | costs decision | Binding | Pursuant to Art. 69(1) UPCA in conjunction with R. 118.5 RoP, the Court shall decide on the obligation to bear costs. |
UPC Court of Appeal · 2
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| UPC_CoA_464/2024 | inventive step and sufficiency | Binding | in light of the Court of Appeal's recent decisions dated 25 November 2025, in cases UPC_CoA_464/2024 and related cases (Meril/Edwards), as well as cases UPC_CoA_528 and 529/2024 (Amgen/Sanofi and Regeneron). |
| UPC_CoA_528/2024 | inventive step and sufficiency | Binding | as well as cases UPC_CoA_528 and 529/2024 (Amgen/Sanofi and Regeneron). The submissions should address the legal implications of the aforementioned Court of Appeal decisions only |
courtName.other · 1
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| Article 69(1) | obligation to bear costs – unsuccessful party | Binding | Pursuant to Art. 69(1) UPCA in conjunction with R. 118.5 RoP, the Court shall decide on the obligation to bear costs. |
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.
Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.