Overview · Filed: Jan 21, 2025
UPC_CFI_43/2025
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTROLLING POSITION
InfringementMain Infringement ActionThe Hague LDInfringementCase Closed
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.
UPC (CFI) · 4
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| UPC_CFI_239/2023 | infringement by equivalents | Persuasive | While there is no harmonized approach to determining an equivalent use of the teaching of the patent among the Local Divisions of this Court yet (see: Local Chamber in The Hague, decision on the merits of 22 November 2024, UPC_CFI_239/2023 |
| UPC_CFI_471/2023 | infringement by equivalents | Persuasive | Local Chamber in Mannheim, decision on the merits of 6. Juni 2025, UPC_CFI_471/2023 |
| UPC_CFI_363/2024 | infringement by equivalents | Persuasive | Local Chamber in Paris, decision on the merits 1. August 2025, UPC_CFI_363/2024 |
| Brussels Local Chamber Beslissing ten gronde 17.01.2025 | infringement by equivalents | Persuasive | Brussels Local Chamber, Beslissing ten gronde of 17 January 2025, para. |
Rules of Procedure · 2
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| RoP_rule_25 | counterclaim for revocation — content requirements (front-loaded) | Binding | R 25.1 RoP requires the counterclaim for revocation to contain an indication of the facts relied on (R 25.1 (c) RoP) and the evidence relied on, where available |
| RoP_rule_preamble | front-loaded procedure / full case early | Binding | The parties are under an obligation to set out their full case as early as possible (Preamble RoP 7, last sentence) |
EPC article · 1
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| 70(1) | authentic text of patent / language of proceedings | Binding | According to Art 70 (1) EPC, the text of a European patent in the language of the proceedings shall be the authentic text in any proceedings before the European Patent Office and in any Contracting State. |
courtName.national_DE_OLG · 1
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| LG München I 7 O 9383/25 | infringement by equivalents — summary of EU member state doctrines | Background | LG München I (7. Zivilkammer), order on the merits of 25. September 2025 – 7 O 9383/25 for a summary of the doctrines of equivalence or equivalence test of the EU member states |
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.
Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.