UPC_CFI_433/2024

METHOD AND MEANS FOR BROWSING BY WALKING

Parent infringement case:UPC_CFI_164/2024

RevocationCounter Claim for RevocationParis CDCounter claim for revocationOral Phase

This case cites

Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
30	claim amendment — formal requirements for application to amend	Binding	The defendant in a counterclaim for revocation action is entitled to amend the patent, provided that the relevant application is included in the statement of defence ... and contains the information referred to in Rule 30 'RoP'.
30.1	claim amendment — admissibility of auxiliary requests for clarity	Binding	Auxiliary Requests II – XVII were not filed in compliance with the requirements provided in Rule 30 (1) 'RoP' and, in particular, were not filed in such a way as to enable the Court to unambiguously understand the scope of the proposed amendments

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
123(2)	added matter — infringement of Art. 123(2) EPC in claim 1	Binding	the infringement of Article 123 (2) 'EPC' found with reference to features 1.2 and 1.4 remains unrectified.

Cited by

Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.

Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.