UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 466/2025

May 27, 2025·EP3805415 · METAL PLATE FOR MANUFACTURING DEPOSITION MASK, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING METAL PLATE, DEPOSITION MASK AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING DEPOSITION MASK

Case details
Status
Oral Phase
Action
Infringement
Category
Main infringement action
Parties
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Dusseldorf LD
Technology
  • Electrical engineering
    Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy · Semiconductors
  • Chemistry
    Materials, metallurgy · Surface technology, coating
Language
German
First decided
Feb 18, 2026
Last decision
Aug 21, 2026
How this compares
The court's record for this kind of case, counted in first-instance rulings. A figure in brackets is the number of rulings a rate rests on.
Infringement foundMedian days to first decision
All UPC53% (62/117)124
Dusseldorf LDLockedLocked
Judge Ronny ThomasLockedLocked
Judge Tatyana ZhilovaLockedLocked
Judge Schumacher JuleLockedLocked
Judge Lorenzo ParriniLockedLocked

At the UPC: Dai Nippon Printing Co., Ltd. (5 cases)·Zapp AG (5 cases)

Decisions
  • 2026-08-21
    InfringementPublic

    Summary: In an infringement action by Dai Nippon Printing against Zapp AG and Zapp Precision Metals GmbH concerning EP 3 805 415, the Local Division Düsseldorf ruled on the claimant's request for simultaneous interpretation (German to Japanese) at the oral hearing scheduled for 17 September 2026. The Court held that simultaneous interpretation should be permitted in principle, but that its cost should not become part of the recoverable procedural costs, since the claimant is not disadvantaged by the language of proceedings beyond what is typical for a multilingual international court. It therefore permitted the claimant to engage her own interpreter(s) at her own expense, using the courtroom's interpretation equipment where practical, and allowed the claimant's Japanese in-house staff and Japanese patent/legal advisors (Kyowa Patent and Law Office) to attend the hearing by videoconference.

    Show the legal issues (3)
    • request for court-arranged simultaneous interpretation at the oral hearing (R. 109 RoP)
    • whether interpretation costs form part of the recoverable procedural costs (R. 109.2, R. 109.5, R. 150 RoP)
    • remote participation of foreign advisors and staff by videoconference (R. 112.3(a) RoP)
  • 2026-02-18
    Application RoP262APublic

    Summary: Provisional procedural order of the Düsseldorf Local Division (judge-rapporteur Dr. Zhilova) on an application by defendants Zapp AG and Zapp Precision Metals GmbH for protection of confidential information under Rule 262A RoP. The defendants sought to restrict access to specific paragraphs of their defense pleadings (Duplik) and certain exhibits (HE 137-145) as trade secrets. The order addressed the classification of the information as confidential and the specification of which persons would be granted access.

    Show the legal issues (3)
    • Protection of confidential information under Rule 262A RoP
    • Trade secrets in patent litigation
    • Restriction of access to pleadings and exhibits
Document titleDatePublic
Receipt2026-10-07Not public
Cover sheet2026-10-07Not public
Document Defendant2026-10-07Not public
Receipt2026-09-29Not public
Cover sheet2026-09-29Not public
Document2026-09-29Not public
Hearing recording reference document2026-09-29Not public
Receipt2026-09-15Not public
Cover sheet2026-09-15Not public
Document2026-09-15Not public