UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 472/2026

Feb 4, 2026·EP3251983 · CONVEYOR BELT

Case details
Status
Written Phase (Settled)
Action
Counterclaim for revocation
Category
Counterclaim for revocation
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Munich LD
Technology
  • Mechanical engineering
    Handling
Language
German
First decided
Sep 14, 2026
How this compares
The court's record for this kind of case, counted in first-instance rulings. A figure in brackets is the number of rulings a rate rests on.
Patent revokedMedian days to first decision
All UPC37% (34/91)124
Munich LDLockedLocked
Judge Matthias ZigannLockedLocked
Judge Ina SchnurrLockedLocked
Judge Mojca MlakarLockedLocked
Judge Lorenzo ParriniLockedLocked

At the UPC: ScanBelt Modular Conveyor Systems A/S (2 cases)·Laitram L.L.C. (2 cases)

Decisions
  • 2026-09-14
    revocation counterclaim

    Summary: Munich Local Division decision (Panel 1b, 25 Aug 2026; published 14 Sep 2026) in Laitram L.L.C. v ScanBelt Modular Conveyor Systems A/S (EP 3 251 983; infringement action UPC_CFI_642/2025 and counterclaim for revocation UPC_CFI_472/2026): on both parties' request the court confirms under Art. 79 UPCA and R. 365, R. 11.2 RoP that the parties concluded the settlement agreement of 15 Jul 2026, including its costs clause; no further cost decision is required and the details of the settlement are confidential, with only redacted versions entered in the register.

    Show the legal issues (3)
    • Confirmation of a settlement by decision of the court (Art. 79 UPCA; R. 365, R. 11.2 RoP)
    • Confidentiality of settlement terms (R. 365.2, 262.2 RoP)
    • Costs per the settlement (R. 365.4 RoP)
Document titleDatePublic
Other Documents2026-09-14Public
Decision2026-09-14Public
Order2026-09-08Public
Note2026-09-07Not public
Receipt2026-09-02Not public
Cover sheet2026-09-02Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-09-02Not public
Submission Defendant2026-09-02Not public
Receipt2026-09-02Not public
Cover sheet2026-09-02Not public