UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 490/2025

EP2465265 · METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR IMPROVED INTRA CHROMA ENCODING AND DECODING

Case details
Status
Patent upheld as granted
Action
Counterclaim for revocation
Category
Counterclaim for revocation
Parties
Division
Mannheim LD
Technology
  • Electrical engineering
    Audio-visual technology
Language
—
First decided
Jun 16, 2026
How this compares
The court's record for this kind of case, counted in first-instance rulings. A figure in brackets is the number of rulings a rate rests on.
Patent revokedMedian days to first decision
All UPC37% (34/91)124
Mannheim LDLockedLocked
Judge Peter TochtermannLockedLocked
Judge Tobias SenderLockedLocked
Judge Daniel SeverinssonLockedLocked
Judge Dennis KretschmannLockedLocked

At the UPC: Disney Group (26 cases)·InterDigital Group (34 cases)

Decisions
  • 2026-06-16
    Counterclaim for revocationPublic

    Summary: The Mannheim Local Division found that the Disney defendants infringed EP 2 465 265 by offering and placing on the market encoded picture data and signals comprising video data in eleven Contracting Member States. The defendants' counterclaim for revocation was dismissed, and the defendants were ordered to bear the litigation costs. Injunctive relief and damages liability were granted, subject to Claimant providing 8 million euro security before enforcement of injunctive orders.

    Show the legal issues (8)
    • Patent infringement of video encoding patent (EP 2 465 265)
    • Counterclaim for revocation
    • Scope of injunctive relief across multiple Contracting Member States
    • Security requirement for enforcement of injunctive orders (8 million euro)
    • Joint and several liability of defendant group
    • Recall and removal from market
    • Disclosure of sales/revenue information for damages calculation
    • Penalty payments for violation of court orders
Documents
  • 86-25%20redacted.pdf2026-06-16EN
Accepted arguments
What the court agreed with — by party.
  • The defendants infringed EP 2 465 265 by offering and placing on the market encoded picture data directly produced by a method in a video encoder and signals comprising video data in the specified Contracting Member States

    ClaimantLegal basis: EP 2 465 265; Art. 25 UPCA
Rejected arguments
What the court did not agree with — and why.
  • Counterclaim for revocation of EP 2 465 265

    RespondentLegal basis: Art. 65 UPCA