UPClytics
DeutschEnglish
AnmeldenRegistrieren
Alle Fälle anzeigen

UPC CFI 490/2025

—·EP2465265: METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR IMPROVED INTRA CHROMA ENCODING AND DECODING

Verfahrensdetails
Status
—
Verfahrensart
Widerklage Nichtigkeit
Kategorie
Widerklage auf Nichtigkeit
Parteien
Kläger
Vertreter: Cordula Schumacher; Lisa Rieth
Division
—
Richter
Technology
Telecommunications
Sprache
—
Erste Entscheidung
16. Juni 2026
Ansprüche
Hinweise: The decision confirms infringement of EP 2 465 265 and dismisses the counterclaim for revocation; specific claim numbers were not discernible from the available excerpts of the redacted decision.
Entscheidungen
  • 2026-06-16
    VerletztUnterlassung angeordnetNichtigkeit (Hauptsache)Counterclaim for revocation

    The Mannheim Local Division found that the Disney defendants infringed EP 2 465 265 by offering and placing on the market encoded picture data and signals comprising video data in eleven Contracting Member States. The defendants' counterclaim for revocation was dismissed, and the defendants were ordered to bear the litigation costs. Injunctive relief and damages liability were granted, subject to Claimant providing 8 million euro security before enforcement of injunctive orders.

    Rechtsfragen:Patent infringement of video encoding patent (EP 2 465 265)Counterclaim for revocationScope of injunctive relief across multiple Contracting Member StatesSecurity requirement for enforcement of injunctive orders (8 million euro)Joint and several liability of defendant groupRecall and removal from marketDisclosure of sales/revenue information for damages calculationPenalty payments for violation of court orders
    Schadenersatz: Haftung festgestellt, Höhe vorbehalten
Dokumente
  • 86-25%20redacted.pdf2026-06-16EN
Angenommene Argumente
Was das Gericht akzeptiert hat — nach Partei.

  • The defendants infringed EP 2 465 265 by offering and placing on the market encoded picture data directly produced by a method in a video encoder and signals comprising video data in the specified Contracting Member States

    KlägerRechtsgrundlage: EP 2 465 265; Art. 25 UPCA
Zurückgewiesene Argumente
Was das Gericht nicht akzeptiert hat — und warum.

  • Counterclaim for revocation of EP 2 465 265

    BeklagterRechtsgrundlage: Art. 65 UPCA