UPC CFI 537/2024
Sep 23, 2024·EP2579551 · Method and apparatus pertaining to automatically performing an application function of an electronic device based upon detecting a change in physical configuration of the device
- Case details
- StatusCase ClosedActionInfringementCategoryMain infringement action
- Parties
- Respondents
- Nintendo of Europe SEOperating co.
- Nintendo Co., Ltd.Operating co.
Representatives- Johannes Heselberger-Bardehle Pagenberg
- Division
- Hamburg LD
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringTelecommunications
- Language
- English
- First decided
- Oct 28, 2025
| Infringement found | Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|---|
| All UPC | 53% (62/117) | 124 |
| Hamburg LD | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Sabine Klepsch | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Stefan Schilling | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Marije Knijff | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Ulrike Keltsch | — | Locked |
At the UPC: Malikie Innovations Ltd. (20 cases)·Nintendo of Europe SE (5 cases)
This dispute contains 2 other proceedings
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Hamburg LD·2024
- 2025-10-28Infringement ActionPublic
Summary: Hamburg Local Division procedural order summarising the interim conference of 22 October 2025 in Malikie Innovations v. Nintendo, including case management orders: case value set at EUR 7.5 million (EUR 3m infringement + EUR 4.5m counterclaim), agreement on reimbursable legal costs (approximately 50% of ceiling), updates on parallel proceedings, and admission of second round of patent amendment auxiliary requests.
Show the legal issues (4)
- Case management (interim conference, R. 105.5 RoP)
- Case value
- Patent amendment auxiliary requests
- Parallel German Federal Patent Court proceedings
- 2025-04-23Application RoP262APublic
Summary: Procedural order granting Nintendo's request for confidentiality protection (Rule 262A RoP) of sales data in their Statement of Defence. Access to unredacted information restricted to two named reliable persons on the Claimant's side, subject to conditions. Claimant's request for access for two specific employees was accommodated.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Confidentiality protection (Rule 262A RoP)
- Trade secrets
- Access to confidential information in litigation
| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Case closed | 2025-12-02 | Not public |
| Order | 2025-11-28 | Not public |
| Order | 2025-11-28 | Public |
| Cover sheet | 2025-11-27 | Not public |
| Other document Defendant | 2025-11-27 | Not public |
| Receipt | 2025-11-27 | Not public |
| Cover sheet | 2025-11-27 | Not public |
| Application document Claimant | 2025-11-27 | Not public |
| Receipt | 2025-11-27 | Not public |
| Interim procedure opened | 2025-11-26 | Not public |