UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 541/2025

Jun 17, 2025·EP3859566 Unitary patent · SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PRODUCT VISUALIZATION USING A SINGLE-PAGE APPLICATION

Case details
Status
Oral Phase (Withdrawn)
Action
Infringement
Category
Main infringement action
Parties
Claimants
Respondents
Division
Dusseldorf LD
Technology
  • Electrical engineering
    Computer technology · IT methods for management
Language
English
First decided
Oct 15, 2025
Last decision
Feb 19, 2026
How this compares
The court's record for this kind of case, counted in first-instance rulings. A figure in brackets is the number of rulings a rate rests on.
Infringement foundMedian days to first decision
All UPC53% (62/117)124
Dusseldorf LDLockedLocked
Judge Ronny ThomasLockedLocked
Judge Jule SchumacherLockedLocked
Judge Stefan JohanssonLockedLocked
Judge Torsten DuhmeLockedLocked

At the UPC: Leap Tools Inc. (1 case)·Wizart Inc. (1 case)

Decisions
  • 2026-02-19
    Infringement ActionPublic

    Summary: The Düsseldorf Local Division issued an order on Wizart's request for security for costs under R. 158 RoP in proceedings against Leap Tools (Canada), addressing whether the claimant's Canadian domicile and financial situation justify ordering security.

    Show the legal issues (3)
    • Security for costs (R. 158 RoP)
    • Claimant domiciled outside UPC territory
    • Enforcement of cost orders in Canada
  • 2025-11-17
    Application RoP 265Public

    Summary: The Düsseldorf Local Division permitted the claimant to withdraw the infringement action against Defendant 2 (Wizart LLC) under R. 265.1 RoP after Defendant 1 asserted that Wizart LLC was a non-existent entity; the statement of claim had not yet been served on Defendant 2.

    Show the legal issues (2)
    • R. 265.1 RoP withdrawal of action against non-existent defendant
    • Service failure on entity of doubtful existence
  • 2025-10-15

    Summary: The Düsseldorf Local Division granted the claimant's application to serve the statement of claim on Defendant 2 (Wizart LLC) by an alternative method — delivery to the CEO's business address in Poland — after service at the registered address had failed.

    Show the legal issues (3)
    • R. 275.1 RoP service by alternative method
    • Service on defendant with unknown address
    • Service via registered agent
Document titleDatePublic
Hearing recording reference document2026-10-15Not public
Order2026-10-09Not public
Order2026-10-09Public
Oral procedure opened2026-10-08Not public
Receipt2026-10-07Not public
Cover sheet2026-10-07Not public
Submission Claimant2026-10-07Not public
Order2026-10-05Not public
Order2026-10-05Public
Interim procedure opened2026-09-17Not public