UPC CFI 541/2025
Jun 17, 2025·EP3859566 Unitary patent · SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PRODUCT VISUALIZATION USING A SINGLE-PAGE APPLICATION
- Case details
- StatusOral Phase (Withdrawn)ActionInfringementCategoryMain infringement action
- Parties
- Claimants
- Leap Tools Inc.Operating co.
Representatives- Henrik Timmann-rospatt Rechtsanwälte PartGmbB
- Melanie Strobel-rospatt Rechtsanwälte PartGmbB
- Manuel Schradersupporting-Blumbach Zinngrebe Patentanwälte PartG mbB
- Volker Mergelsupporting-Blumbach Zinngrebe Patentanwälte PartG mbB
Respondents- Wizart Inc.Operating co.
- Wizart LLCOperating co.
Representatives- Oskar Ginko-AOMB
- Aloys Hüttermann-Michalski Hüttermann & Partner Patentanwälte mbB
- Rolf Claessen-Michalski Hüttermann & Partner Patentanwälte mbB
- Fabian Pech-Michalski Hüttermann & Partner Patentanwälte mbB
- Oskar Gińko
- Division
- Dusseldorf LD
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringComputer technology · IT methods for management
- Language
- English
- First decided
- Oct 15, 2025
- Last decision
- Feb 19, 2026
| Infringement found | Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|---|
| All UPC | 53% (62/117) | 124 |
| Dusseldorf LD | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Ronny Thomas | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Jule Schumacher | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Stefan Johansson | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Torsten Duhme | Locked | Locked |
At the UPC: Leap Tools Inc. (1 case)·Wizart Inc. (1 case)
- 2026-02-19Infringement ActionPublic
Summary: The Düsseldorf Local Division issued an order on Wizart's request for security for costs under R. 158 RoP in proceedings against Leap Tools (Canada), addressing whether the claimant's Canadian domicile and financial situation justify ordering security.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Security for costs (R. 158 RoP)
- Claimant domiciled outside UPC territory
- Enforcement of cost orders in Canada
- 2025-11-17Application RoP 265Public
Summary: The Düsseldorf Local Division permitted the claimant to withdraw the infringement action against Defendant 2 (Wizart LLC) under R. 265.1 RoP after Defendant 1 asserted that Wizart LLC was a non-existent entity; the statement of claim had not yet been served on Defendant 2.
Show the legal issues (2)
- R. 265.1 RoP withdrawal of action against non-existent defendant
- Service failure on entity of doubtful existence
- 2025-10-15
Summary: The Düsseldorf Local Division granted the claimant's application to serve the statement of claim on Defendant 2 (Wizart LLC) by an alternative method — delivery to the CEO's business address in Poland — after service at the registered address had failed.
Show the legal issues (3)
- R. 275.1 RoP service by alternative method
- Service on defendant with unknown address
- Service via registered agent
| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Hearing recording reference document | 2026-10-15 | Not public |
| Order | 2026-10-09 | Not public |
| Order | 2026-10-09 | Public |
| Oral procedure opened | 2026-10-08 | Not public |
| Receipt | 2026-10-07 | Not public |
| Cover sheet | 2026-10-07 | Not public |
| Submission Claimant | 2026-10-07 | Not public |
| Order | 2026-10-05 | Not public |
| Order | 2026-10-05 | Public |
| Interim procedure opened | 2026-09-17 | Not public |