UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 56/2025

Jan 24, 2025·EP3402420 · AUTOGRAFTING TOOL WITH ENHANCED FLUTE PROFILE AND METHODS OF USE

Case details
Status
Case Closed (Patent infringed)
Action
Infringement
Category
Main infringement action
Parties
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Dusseldorf LD
Technology
  • Instruments
    Medical technology
  • Mechanical engineering
    Machine tools
Language
German
First decided
Aug 25, 2026
How this compares
The court's record for this kind of case, counted in first-instance rulings. A figure in brackets is the number of rulings a rate rests on.
Infringement foundMedian days to first decision
All UPC53% (62/117)124
Dusseldorf LDLockedLocked
Judge Ronny ThomasLockedLocked
Judge Peter AgergaardLockedLocked
Judge Schumacher JuleLockedLocked
Judge Christian DanielLockedLocked

At the UPC: Versah LLC (3 cases)·HaeNaem Co., Ltd. (2 cases)

Decisions
  • 2026-08-25
    InfringementPublic

    Summary: The Local Division Düsseldorf (Panel 1) found that HaeNaem Co., Ltd. and Adin Dental Implant Systems Ltd. infringed claim 1 (and, via dependency, claim 11) of EP 3 402 420 B1 by importing and placing the accused rotary dental osteotomes on the market in Germany. The court ordered the defendants to cease and desist across nine UPC member states (Germany, Austria, Denmark, Italy, Belgium, Finland, France, the Netherlands and Sweden), to recall the infringing products from commercial distributees, and to render information and accounts, and declared them liable in principle for damages incurred since 1 August 2020. The revocation counterclaim (UPC_CFI_864/2025), raising added matter, insufficiency, and lack of novelty and inventive step over WO2014/077920 A1 and WO2015/138842 A1, was examined on the merits and rejected as unfounded, so the patent is maintained as granted.

    Show the legal issues (7)
    • Direct infringement of a product claim: whether the challenged embodiment is objectively capable, given its nature and suitability for use, of fulfilling the claim features
    • Standing to sue (Aktivlegitimation) of an exclusive (sub-)licensee under Art. 47(2) UPCA
    • Added matter under Art. 138(1)(c) EPC
    • Insufficiency of disclosure under Art. 138(1)(b) EPC
    • Novelty of claims 1 and 11 over WO2014/077920 A1 and WO2015/138842 A1
    • Inventive step of claim 1 in light of the 'negative rake angle' feature
    • Jurisdiction deemed accepted under R. 19.7 RoP absent a preliminary objection under R. 19
Document titleDatePublic
Publication of decision2026-08-25Not public
Decision2026-08-25Public
Case closed2026-08-25Not public
Decision2026-08-25Not public
Decision2026-08-25Not public
Communication2026-07-29Not public
Receipt2026-07-29Not public
Cover sheet2026-07-29Not public
Document2026-07-29Not public
Document2026-07-29Not public